Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T03:36:11.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seyfert Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Andrew S. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Astronomy Program, University of Maryland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Observations of sample of Markarian Seyferts with the VLA indicate that a large fraction possess linear radio structure on a scale of a few hundred parsecs to a few kiloparsecs. The radio components generally straddle the optical nucleus and several sources are simple doubles. Similar structures are seen in the classical Seyferts NGC 1068, 4151, and 5548. NGC 4151 is probably best interpreted as a jet. A few sources (e.g. Mark 315, NGC 7469) exhibit diffuse, non-aligned radio structure on a scale similar to that of the linear sources. The radio axis in linear sources is misaligned with respect to the rotation axis of the galaxy disc by a large angle. The linear sources are discussed in terms of a model of a supersonic beam or jet which is “disrupted” by interaction with interstellar gas in the inner part of the galaxy (often a spiral). Two aspects of this interaction are emphasised. Firstly, the curved shape of the radio sources in NGC 1068 and NGC 4151 is ascribed to beam bending by the ram pressure of the rotating interstellar medium. Simple models of this process are shown to be consistent with the observations. Secondly, it is suggested that the broadened forbidden lines in Seyferts originate in part from interstellar gas accelerated outwards by the beam. This picture accounts for some of the empirical correlations found between radio and optical forbidden line properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1982 

References

Adams, T.F. 1977, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 33, 19.Google Scholar
Begelman, M.C., Rees, M.J. and Blandford, R.D. 1979, Nature, 279, 770.Google Scholar
Blandford, R.D. and Königl, A. 1979, Astrophys. Letts., 20, 15.Google Scholar
Booler, R.V., Pedlar, A. and Davies, R.D. 1981, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., (submitted).Google Scholar
de Bruyn, A.G. and Wilson, A.S. 1976, Astron. & Astrophys., 53, 93.Google Scholar
de Bruyn, A.G. and Wilson, A.S. 1978, Astron. & Astrophys., 64, 433.Google Scholar
Burbidge, E.M., Burbidge, G.R. and Prendergast, K.H. 1959, Astrophys. J., 130, 26.Google Scholar
Clements, E. 1981, Mon. Nots. R. astr. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
Condon, J.J., Condon, M.A., Gisler, G. and Puschell, J.J. 1981, Preprint.Google Scholar
Crane, P.C. 1977, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Heckman, T.A., Miley, G.K., van Breugel, W.J.M. and Butcher, H.R. 1981, Preprint.Google Scholar
Huchra, J. and Sargent, W.L.W. 1973, Astrophys. J., 186, 433.Google Scholar
Johnston, K.J., Elvis, M., Kjer, D. and Shen, B.S.P. 1981, Astrophys. J. (Letters), (submitted).Google Scholar
Kruit, P.C. van der Oort, J.H. and Mathewson, D.S. 1972, Astron. & Astrophys., 21, 169.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G.D. and Miller, J.S. 1980, Astrophys. J., 240, 759.Google Scholar
Simkin, S.M. 1975, Astrophys. J., 200, 567.Google Scholar
Simkin, S.M., Su, H.J. and Schwarz, M.P. 1980, Astrophys J., 237, 404.Google Scholar
Sramek, R.A. and Tovmassian, H.M. 1975, Astrophys. J., 196, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockman, H.S., Angel, J.R.P. and Miley, G.K. 1979, Astrophys. J. (Letters), 227, L55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulvestad, J.S. 1981, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Ulvestad, J.S., Wilson, A.S. and Sramek, R.A. 1981, Astrophys. J., (in press, July 15 issue).Google Scholar
Wilson, A.S. and Willis, A.G. 1980, Astrophys. J., 240, 429.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.S. 1981, In “Optical Jets in Galaxies”, Proceedings of the 2nd ESO/ESA Workshop on the use of the Space Telescope and coordinated ground based research, 18–19 Feb. 1981, Munich, p. 125, (ESA SP-162).Google Scholar
Woltjer, L. 1959, Astrophys. J., 130, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar