Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:44.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection of Cosmological Models Using QSOs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

R. C. Roeder*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy and Scarborough College, University of Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is assumed that the QSOs are at cosmological distances as indicated by their emission-line redshifts. It is further assumed, as indicated by present evidence, that none of the 21 QSOs with emission-line redshifts, ze, of 2.0 ± 0.1 (or of the 30 with ze = 2.0 ± 0.2) is screened by an intervening normal galaxy. The simplest conclusion from these data is, then, that the screening probability must be less than 0.08 (or 0.06) at ze = 2.0. This, in turn, restricts allowable cosmological models in the (σ0, q0) diagram by providing lower limits for ß0 as a function of q0. One can also rank cosmological models in order of the probability that there be no screening of the 21 (or 30) objects. In either case the steady state model ranks higher than the general relativity models found by Peach to give the best fit in the (mz) diagram.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1972 

References

Bahcall, J. N. and Peebles, P. J. E.: 1969, Astrophys. J. Letters 156, L7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiles, C.: 1970, Astrophys. J. Letters 160, L83.Google Scholar
Peach, J. V.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, R. C.: 1970, in press.Google Scholar
Roeder, R. C. and Verreault, R. T.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 155, 1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuter, W. L. H. and Gower, J. F. R.: 1969, Nature 223, 1046.Google Scholar