Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T03:30:41.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relativistic effects in geodynamics(*)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

C. Boucher
C. Boucher*
Affiliation:
Institut Géographique National, 2, Avenue Pasteur, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Geodesy has now reached such an accuracy in both measuring and modelling that time variations of the size, shape and gravity field of the Earth must be basically considered under the name of Geodynamics. The objective is therefore the description of point positions and gravity field functions in a terrestrial reference frame, together with their time variations.

For this purpose, relativistic effects must be taken into account in models. Currently viable theories of gravitation such as Einstein's General Relativity can be expressed in the solar system into the parametrized post-newtonian (PPN) formalism. Basic problems such as the motion of a test particle give a satisfactory answer to the relativistic modelling in Geodynamics.

The relativistic effects occur in the definition of a terrestrial reference frame and gravity field. They also appear widely into terrestrial (gravimetry, inertial techniques) and space (satellite laser, Lunar laser, VLBI, satellite radioelectric tracking …) measurements.

Type
Relativistic Effects Near the Earth
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 114: Relativity in Celestial Mechanics and Astrometry , 1986 , pp. 241 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Ashby, N., 1980: Relativistic Kepler problem and construction of a local inertial frame, Univ. of Colorado, Dept. of Physics, Boulder Google Scholar
Ashby, N., Allan, D.W., 1979: ‘Practical implications of Relativity for a global coordinate time scale’, Radio Sci. 14.4, 649–669 Google Scholar
Ashby, N., Bertotti, B., 1984: ‘Relativistic perturbations of an Earth satellite’, Phys. Rev. Letters 52.7, 485–488 Google Scholar
Bjerhammar, A., 1984: Relativistic estimation in Geodesy, draft 29 April 1984 Google Scholar
Boucher, C., 1978: ‘Relativistic correction to satellite Doppler observation’, Proceedings IAG. SSG 4.45 meeting “The Mathematical structure of the Gravity Field”, Lagonissi, Greece, National Technical University, Athens Google Scholar
Boucher, C., 1981: ‘Relativistic effects in inertial technology for Geodesy’, Proceedings 2nd international Symposium on Inertial Technology for Surveying and Geodesy, Banff, Canada.Google Scholar
Boucher, C., Lestrade, J.F., 1984: ‘Survey of relativistic effects in Geodesy and Fundamental Astronomy’, Proceedings Journées Relativistes 84, Aussois, France, Lecture Notes in Physics n° 212, Springer, Heidelberg Google Scholar
CCIR, 1978: ‘Relativistic effects in a terrestrial coordinate time system’, 14th Plenary Meeting of CCIR, Kyoto, vol. VII, Report 439.3 .Google Scholar
Cugusi, L., Proverbio, E., 1978: ‘Relativistic effects on the motion of Earth's artificial satellites’, Astron. Astrophys., 69, 321–325 Google Scholar
Dallas, S.S., 1979: ‘Equations of motion for rotating finite bodies in the extended PPN formalism’, Celestial Mech. 15, 111–123 Google Scholar
Fanselow, J.L., Sovers, O.J., 1985: Observation Model and Parameter partials for the JPL VLBI Parameter Estimation Software MASTERFIT V2.0 NASA/JPL Publication 83–39 rev.1, Pasadena, Ca.Google Scholar
Filkenstein, A.M., Kreinovitch, V.J., Pandey, S.N., 1983: ‘Relativistic reductions for radiointerferometric observables’, Astrophys. Space Sci. 94, 233–247 Google Scholar
Fujimoto, M.K., 1984: ‘Lecture notes on Relativistic Framework’, Stuttgart, preprint, Dec. 1984 Google Scholar
Fukushima, T., Fujimoto, M.K., Kinoshita, H., Aoki, S., 1985: ‘System of astronomical constants in the relativistic framework’, subm. Celest. Mech. Google Scholar
Fukushima, T., Fujimoto, M.K., Kinoshita, H., Aoki, S., 1986: ‘Reference frames in the general relativistic framework’, these proceedings Google Scholar
Gaposchkin, E.M., Wright, J.P., 1968: A measurable effect of General Relativity in satellite orbits, SAO Special Report 283, Cambridge Google Scholar
Gibson, L.R., 1983: A derivation of relativistic effects in satellite tracking, NSWC TR 83-55, Naval Surface Weapons Center, Dahlgren, Va.Google Scholar
Harkins, M.D., 1973: Relativistic effects in satellite dynamics and Doppler tracking, NWL TR-2965, Dahlgren, Va.Google Scholar
Harkins, M.D., 1979: ‘The relativistic Doppler shift in satellite tracking’, Radio Sci. 14.4, 671–675 Google Scholar
Hellings, R.W., 1985: ‘Relativistic effects in astronomical timing observations and VLBI’, preprint, Séminaire “Systèmes de référence”, Paris, 27 Feb. 1985Google Scholar
Jenkins, R.E., 1969: ‘A satellite observation of the relativistic Doppler shift’, Astron. J. 74.7, 960–963 Google Scholar
Laubscher, R.E., 1983: ‘A simulation of a relativistic effect in oneway Doppler tracking of satellites’, AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco Google Scholar
Ma, C., 1978: Very Long Baseline Interferometry applied to polar motion, relativity and geodesy, NASA GSFC TM 79582, Greenbelt, Md. Google Scholar
Malyevac, C.A., Tanenbaum, M., 1981: ‘Relativistic effects on Doppler point positioning results’, AGU Spring Meeting, Baltimore Google Scholar
Martin, C.F., Torrence, M.H., 1981: ‘Effects of General Relativity on LAGEOS semi-major axis’, AGU Spring Meeting, Baltimore Google Scholar
Martin, C.F., Torrence, M.H., Misner, C.W., 1983: ‘Progress on General Relativistic effects affecting LAGEOS data reduction’, draft Google Scholar
Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., Wheeler, J., 1973: Gravitation, Freeman, San Francisco Google Scholar
Moritz, H., 1980: ‘Relativistic effects in reference frames’ Proceedings 2nd IAU Colloquium on Reference coordinate systems for Dynamics, Warsaw Google Scholar
Moyer, T.D., 1971: Mathematical formulation of the Double Precision Orbit Determination Program, JPL TR-32-1527, Pasadena, Ca. Google Scholar
Moyer, T.D., 1981: ‘Transformation from proper time on Earth to coordinate time in Solar system barycentric space-time frame of reference’, Celestial Mech., 23, 33–68 Google Scholar
Murray, C.A., 1983: Vectorial astrometry, Adam Hilger, Bristol Google Scholar
Robertson, D.S., Carter, W.E., 1985: ‘Relativistic deflection of radio signals in the Solar Gravitational Field measured with Very Long Baseline Interferometry’, these proceedings Google Scholar
Rubincam, D.P., 1975: General relativity and satellite orbits, NASA GSFC X-921-75-56.Google Scholar
Rubincam, D.P., 1977: ‘General relativity and satellite orbits: the motion of a test particle in the Schwarzschild metric’, Celest. Mech. 15, 21–33 Google Scholar
Singer, , 1956: ‘Applications of an artificial satellite to the measurement of the general relativistic red shift, Phys. Rev. 104.1, 11–14 Google Scholar
Chenghua, Song, Yulin, Li, 1984: ‘The relativistic effects of integrated Doppler counts”, Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica 5, 26–34 Google Scholar
Teyssandier, P., 1984: ‘Theories of gravity and experimental tests in the post-newtonian limit’, Proceedings Journées Relativistes 84, Aussois, France; Lecture Notes in Physics n° 212, Springer, Heidelberg CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vessot, R.F.C., 1979: ‘Relativity experiments with clocks’, Radio Sci. 14-4, 629–647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburton, R.J., Goodkind, J.M., 1976: ‘Search for evidence of a Preferred Reference Frame’, Astrophys. J. 208, 881–886 Google Scholar
Will, C.M., 1981: Theory and experiment in Gravitation Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Williams, J.G. et al., 1976: ‘New test of the equivalence principle from Lunar laser ranging’, Phys. Rev. Letters 36-11, 551–554 Google Scholar
* This paper was not formally presented during the symposium because the author was unable to attend due to visa problems.Google Scholar