Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:21:35.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship between the system of Astronomical constants and the radar determinations of the Astronomical Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

D. O. Muhleman*
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology(1) and The Harvard College Observatory, Harvard University.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is devoted to an exact discussion of the determination of the astronomical unit with radar and to an extensive error analysis of the technique. Theoretical relationships between the constants are used to construct a consistent set of numerical values of constants based on these results.

Résumé. — Cette Communication est consacrée à la discussion de la détermination de l'unité astronomique à l'aide de radar et à une analyse approfondie des erreurs provenant des techniques employées. On utilise les relations théoriques entre les constantes pour construire un ensemble cohérent de valeurs de constantes à partir de ces résultats.

Zusammenfassung. — Diese Arbeit enthält eine genaue Untersuchung der Bestimmung der Astronomischen Einheit mit Radar und eine eingehende Fehleranalyse ihrer technischen Durchführung. Unter Benutzung der theoretischen Beziehungen zwischen den Konstanten wird aus diesen Ergebnissen ein widerspruchsfreies System numerischer Werte der Konstanten aufgestellt.

Резюме. — Это сообщение посвящено обсуждению определения астрономической единицы при помощи радара и полному анализу погрешностей этой техники. Исходя из теоретических соотношений между постоянными,. автор дает связную систему значений астрономических постоянных.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CNRS 1965 

References

[1] Muhleman, D. O., Holdridge, D. B. and Block, N., Astron. J. , vol. 67, 1962, p. 191.Google Scholar
[2] Bergstrand, E., Arkiv Fysik , vol. 2, 1950, p. 119.Google Scholar
[3] DuMond, J., Ann. Phys. , vol. 7, 1959, p. 365.Google Scholar
[4] Aslakson, , Nature , vol. 164, 1949, p. 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Bol, K., Phys. Rev. , vol. 80, 1950, p. 298.Google Scholar
[6] Essen, L., Proc. Roy. Soc., A , 204, 1951, p. 260.Google Scholar
[7] Bergstrand, E., Arkiv Fysik , vol. 3, 1951, p. 479.Google Scholar
[8] Froome, K. D., Proc. Roy. Soc., A , 213, 1952, p. 123.Google Scholar
[9] Mackenzie, , I. C. C. Ordnance Survey Prof. Paper , no 19, 1954, H. M. S. O., London.Google Scholar
[10] Froome, K. D., Proc. Roy. Soc., A , 223, 1954, p. 195.Google Scholar
[11] Plyler, E. R., Blaine, L. R. and Connor, W. S., J. Opt. Soc. Amer. , vol. 45, 1955, p. 102.Google Scholar
[12] Florman, E. F., N.B.S. Bull. , vol. 39, 1955, p. 1.Google Scholar
[13] Bergstradd, E., Ann. franç. Chronom. , vol. 2, 1907, p. 97.Google Scholar
[14] Froome, K. D., Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 247, 1958, p. 109.Google Scholar
[15] Muhleman, D. O., Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University, 1963.Google Scholar
[16] Muhleman, D. O., Icarus , vol. 1, 1963, p. 6.Google Scholar
[17] Pettingill, G. et al., Astron. J. , vol. 67, 1962, p. 180.Google Scholar
[18] Clemence, G. M., Astron. J. , vol. 53, 1948, p. 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Duncombe, R. L., Astron. Papers , vol. 16, Part I, 1958.Google Scholar
[20] Duncombe, R. L., Personal communication, 1961.Google Scholar
[21] Peabody, P. and Block, N., J. P. L. report to be published.Google Scholar
[22] Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G. M., Planets and Satellites , ed. by Kuiper, and Middlhurst, , Chicago University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
[23] Brouwer, D., unpublished memo, February 1963.Google Scholar