Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T02:56:13.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redshifts of New Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Halton Arp*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85740 Garching, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Observations increasingly demonstrate the spatial association of high redshift objects with larger, low redshift galaxies. These companion objects show a continuous range of physical properties - from very compact, high redshift quasars, through smaller active galaxies and finally to only slightly smaller companion galaxies of slightly higher redshift. The shift in energy distribution from high to low makes it clear that are seeing an empirical evolution from newly created to older, more normal galaxies.

In order to account for the evolution of intrinsic redshift we must conclude that matter is initially born with low mass particles whose mass increase with time (age). This requires a physics which is nonlocal (Machian) and which is therefore more applicable to the cosmos than the Big Bang extrapolation of local physics. Ambartsumian's “superfluid” foresaw some of the properties of the new, low particle mass, protogalactic plasma which is required, demonstrating again the age-old lesson that open minded observation is much more powerful than theoretical assumptions.

Since the ejected plasma, which preferentially emerges along the minor axis of the parent galaxy, develops into an entire galaxy, accretion disks cannot supply sufficient material. New matter must be created within a “white hole” rather than bouncing old matter off a “black hole”.

Type
IV. AGN Related Phenomena
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1999 

References

Ambartsumian, V.A. 1958, Onzieme Conseil de Physique Solvay, ed. Stoops, R., Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1967 Ap.J. 148, 321.Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1968, Astrofizika 4, 59.Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1987, “Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies” Interstellar Media, Berkeley Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1991, Apeiron Nos. 9–10, 18.Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1997, Astrophysics and Space Sciences 250, 163.Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1997a, Astron. Astrophys. 319, 33.Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1997b, Astron. Astrophys. 328, L17.Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1998a, Ap.J. 496, 661.Google Scholar
Arp, H. 1998b, “Seeing Red: Redshift, Cosmology and Acad. Sci.” Apeiron, Montreal Google Scholar
Arp, H., Bi, H., Chu, Y., Zhu, X. 1990, Astron. Astrophys. 239, 33.Google Scholar
Burbidge, G.R., Burbidge, E.M. 1997, Ap.J. 477, L13.Google Scholar
Chu, Y., Wei, J. Hu, J., Zhu, X. and Arp, H. 1998, Ap.J. 500, 596.Google Scholar
Holmberg, E. 1969, Arkiv of Astron., Band 5, 305.Google Scholar
Markarian, B.E., Stepanyan, D.A., Erastova, L.K. 1986 Astrophysics 25, 51 Google Scholar
Narlikar, J.V. and Arp, H. 1993, Ap.J. 405, 51.Google Scholar
Radecke, H.-D. 1997, Astron. Astrophys. 319, 18.Google Scholar
Reimers, D., Hagen, H.-J. 1998, Astron. Astrophys. 329, L25.Google Scholar
Sulentic, J.W., Arp, H. and Di Tullio, G.A. 1978, Ap.J. 220, 47.Google Scholar
Zaritsky, D., Smith, R., Frenk, C.S. and White, S.D.M. 1997, Ap.J. 478, L53.Google Scholar