Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:31:55.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radio studies of HII regions and galactic structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

M. M. Komesaroff  and
G. Westerhout
M. M. Komesaroff
Affiliation:
CSIRO Radiophysics Laboratory, Sydney
G. Westerhout
Affiliation:
University of Maryland

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radio studies of galactic HII regions are best carried out at the two ends of the radio spectrum. At high frequencies, of hundreds or thousands of megacycles per second, HII regions are seen by virtue of their thermal emission against a weak nonthermal background. Since radio waves are unaffected by the obscuration along the plane, it is possible in principle to see right through the Galaxy, and the high resolution which can be achieved in the thousands of megacycles range enables us to study at least the nearer regions in considerable detail. At low frequencies, below about 20 Mc/s, ionized hydrogen is seen in absorption against a bright nonthermal background. Since quite tenuous regions may be almost opaque at the lower frequencies, the technique provides quite a sensitive method of detecting them. The absorption increases with decreasing frequency so that studies at different frequencies enable us to see to varying depths along the line of sight and could permit the derivation of rough distance estimates.

Type
Section 1: The Galaxy
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 20: The Galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds , 1964 , pp. 116 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Academy of Science 1964 

References

Altenhoff, W., Mezger, P. G., Wendker, H., and Westerhout, G. (1960).—Veröffentl. Univ.-Sternwarte Bonn No. 59: 48–86.Google Scholar
Cooper, B. F. C., and Price, R. M. (1962).— Nature 195: 1084–5.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. R. A., Waterworth, M. D., and Bessell, M. (1962).— Nature 196: 1079.Google Scholar
Hoyle, F., and Ellis, G. R. A. (1963).— Aust. J. Phys. 16: 1–7.Google Scholar
Komesaroff, M. M. (1961).— Aust. J. Phys. 14: 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, M. I., Mathewson, D. S., and Haslam, C. G. T. (1961).— M.N. 123: 123–32.Google Scholar
Mathewson, D. S., Healey, J. R., and Rome, J. M. (1962).— Aust. J. Phys. 15: 354–77.Google Scholar
Mills, B. Y. (1959).—“Paris Symposium on Radio Astronomy.” (Ed. Bracewell, R. N..) Symp. IAU 9: 431–46. [Paris 1958.] (Stanford Univ. Press.)Google Scholar
Pottasch, S. (1956).— B.A.N. 13: 77–88.Google Scholar
Shain, C. A. (1954).— Aust. J. Phys. 7: 150–64.Google Scholar
Shain, C. A. (1959).—“Paris Symposium on Radio Astronomy.” (Ed. Bracewell, R. N..) Symp. IAU 9: 451–9. [Paris 1958.] (Stanford Univ. Press.)Google Scholar
Shain, C. A., Komesaroff, M. M. and Higgins, C. S. (1961).— Aust. J. Phys. 14: 508–14.Google Scholar
Westerhout, G. (1958a).— B.A.N. 14: 215–60.Google Scholar
Westerhout, G. (1958b).— B.A.N. 14: 261–3.Google Scholar