Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:35:04.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Predictions of CMB Anisotropies and Distortions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

J. Richard Bond
J. Richard Bond*
Affiliation:
Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A1, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The increasing precision of experiments designed to detect angular anisotropies and spectral distortions of the microwave background has now brought us near to or below the levels predicted by most theories of the formation of structure in the universe. Here I review the quantitative theoretical results for anisotropies and distortions for a wide variety of models. Many of these were presented in the Monday afternoon discussion session on the microwave background held at IAU Symposium 130. Primary and secondary anisotropies (and the associated distortions) are considered for universes with structure arising from initially Gaussian perturbations, especially the scale-invariant ones predicted by inflation, from accretion onto cosmic strings, and from shells generated by explosive energy injection, including that from superconducting strings as well as from supernovae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 130: Large Scale Structures of the Universe , 1988 , pp. 93 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

Bahcall, N. and Soneira, R. 1983, Ap. J., 270, 70.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, G., Dekel, A. and Primack, J., 1987, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar
Bardeen, J.M., Bond, J.R., Kaiser, N. and Szalay, A.S. 1986, Ap. J., 304, 15.Google Scholar
Bardeen, J.M., Bond, J.R. and Efstathiou, G. 1987, Ap. J., 321, 28.Google Scholar
Bardeen, J.M., Bond, J.R. and Salopek, D.S. 1987, in Proceedings Second Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, eds. Coley, A., Dyer, C. (Singapore: World Scientific).Google Scholar
Bond, J.R., Carr, B.J. and Hogan, C.J. 1986, Ap. J. 306, 428 [BCH1]; 1987, Preprint [BCH2].Google Scholar
Bond, J.R. and Efstathiou, G. 1984, Ap. J. Lett. 285, L45; 1987, M.N.R.A.S. 226, 655.Google Scholar
Bond, J.R. 1987, in The Early Universe, Proc. NATO Summer School, Vancouver Is., Aug. 1986, ed., Unruh, W.G. (Dordrecht:Reidel); 1987, Preprint.Google Scholar
Coles, S. and Kaiser, N. 1987, in preparation.Google Scholar
Davies, R.D., Lasenby, A.L., Watson, R.A., Daintree, E.J., Hopkins, J., Beckman, J., Sanchez-Almeida, J. and Rebolo, R. 1987, Nature 326, 462.Google Scholar
Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C.S., and White, S.D.M. 1985, Ap. J. 292, 371.Google Scholar
Dressler, A., Faber, S.M., Burstein, D., Davies, R.L., Lynden-Bell, D., Terlevich, R.J. and Wegner, G. 1987, Ap. J. Lett. 313, L37.Google Scholar
Efstathiou, G. and Bond, J.R. 1986, M.N.R.A.S. 218, 103; 1987, M.N.R.A.S. 227, 33P.Google Scholar
Fixsen, D.J., Cheng, E.S. and Wilkinson, D.T. 1983, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 620.Google Scholar
Hogan, C.J. 1984, Ap. J. Lett. 284, L1.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. and Hogan, C.J. 1983, Ap. J. 274, 7.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. and Lasenby, A.L. 1987, Preprint.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. and Stebbins, A. 1984, Nature 310, 391.Google Scholar
Kofman, L. A. and Linde, A. D. 1987, Nuc. Phys. B282, 555.Google Scholar
Kowasaki, M. and Sato, K. 1987, Preprint.Google Scholar
Lilje, P. and Efstathiou, G. 1987, Preprint.Google Scholar
Lubin, P. and Villela, T. 1986, in Madore, B. F. and Tully, R. B., eds. Galaxy Distances and Deviations from the Hubble Flow (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T., Hayakawa, S., Matsuo, H., Murakami, H., Sato, S., Lange, A.E. and Richards, P.L. 1987, Preprint [BN].Google Scholar
Melchiorri, F., Melchiorri, B.O., Ceccarelli, C. and Pietranera, L. 1981, Ap. J. Lett., 250, L1.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P. and Vishniac, E.T. 1986, Ap. J. Lett. 306, L51.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P., Thompson, C. and Witten, E. 1986, Phys. Lett. B180, 231.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P. and Thompson, C. 1987, Preprint.Google Scholar
Peebles, P.J.E., 1987, Ap. J. 277, L1.Google Scholar
Seldner, M. and Peebles, P.J.E. 1977, Ap. J., 215, 703.Google Scholar
Shafer, R. and Silk, J. 1987, in preparation.Google Scholar
Silk, J. I. and Turner, M. S. 1987, Phys. Rev. D35, in press.Google Scholar
Stebbins, A. 1987, in preparation.Google Scholar
Strukov, I.A., Skulachev, D.P. and Klypin, A.A. 1987, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Szalay, A.S., Bond, J.R. and Silk, J. 1984, Formation and Evolution of Galaxies and Large Scale Structure; The Third Moriond Astrophysics Meeting (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 499.Google Scholar
Traschen, J., Turok, N. and Brandenberger, R. 1986, Phys. Rev. D34, 919.Google Scholar
Uson, J.M. and Wilkinson, D.T. 1984, Nature 312, 427 [UW].Google Scholar
Vishniac, E.T. and Ostriker, J.P. 1985, Societa Italiana di Fisica Conference Proc. 1, 137.Google Scholar
Vishniac, E.T. 1987, Preprint.Google Scholar
White, S.D.M., Frenk, C.S. and Davis, M. 1984, M.N.R.A.S. 209, 27P.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.L. and Silk, J. 1981, Ap. J. 243, 14.Google Scholar