Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:34:24.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Possible Magnetic Activity Cycles of Four Chromospherically Active Binaries: ER Vul, UV Psc, AR Lac and BH Vir

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2016

S. B. Qian*
Affiliation:
Yunnan Observatory, NAOCAS, ULOAC, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 110, 650011 Kunming, P.R. China (e-mail: [email protected])

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study of a possible connection between magnetic activity and orbital period variation in close binaries is a very interesting work. Recently, the orbital periods of four chromospherically active binaries, ER Vul, UV Psc, AR Lac and BH Vir, are analyzed. It is discovered that the orbital periods of UV Psc and BH Vir oscillate with periods of 61 and 9.12 years, and the orbital periods of ER Vul and AR Lac show periodic variations with periods of 31 and 47 years respectively while they undergo secular decrease. The mechanisms that could explain the changes in the orbital periods of the four systems have been studied. The period variation of UV Psc may be caused by the cyclical magnetic activity in the primary component, and the magnetic activity in secondary component of AR Lac can explain its periodic component in the orbital period changes. For the other two systems, BH Vir and ER Vul, the cyclical magnetic activity in one or both of the components can explain the cyclical orbital period changes of BH Vir and the periodic component in the changes of the orbital period of ER Vul. These results suggest that the periods of the orbital period oscillations in the four systems may be the magnetic activity cycles.

Type
Session IV: Structure and Dynamics of the Transiton Region and Corona
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2001 

References

Applegate, J. H., 1992, APJ 385, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applegate, J. H. and Patterson, J., 1987, APJ 322, L99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chochol, D., Pribulla, T., Teodorani, M., et al., 1998, A&A 340, 415.Google Scholar
Hall, D. S., 1976, Proc. IAU. Coll. No. 29, Budapest, Part 1, P. 287.Google Scholar
Hall, D. S., 1991, APJ 380, L85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. S., 1990, Period Changes and Magnetic Cycles, in: İbanoǧlu, C. (ed.) Active Close Binaries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, P. 95.Google Scholar
Hall, D. S., 1980, Acta Astron. 30, 387.Google Scholar
İbanoǧlu, C., Keskin, M. C., Akan, S., et al., 1994, A&A 281, 811.Google Scholar
Keskin, V., İbanoǧlu, C., Akan, M. C. et al., 1994, A&A 187, 817.Google Scholar
Kalimeris, A., Mitrou, C. K., Doyle, J.G., et al., 1995, A&A 293, 371.Google Scholar
Lanza, A. F., Rodonò, M. and Rosner, R., 1998, MNRAS 296, 893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanza, A. F. and Rodonò, M., 1999, A&A 349, 887.Google Scholar
Matese, J. J. and Whitmire, D. P., 1983, A&A 117, L7.Google Scholar
Shengbang, Qian, Qingyao, Liu and Yulan, Yang, 1998, ApSS 257, 1.Google Scholar
Shengbang, Qian, Qingyao, Liu and Yulan, Yang, 1999a, Chinese Astron. and Astrophy. 23, 317.Google Scholar
Shengbang, Qian, Qingyao, Liu and Yulan, Yang, 1999b, ApSS 266, 529.Google Scholar
Shengbang, Qian, Qingyao, Liu and Wenli, Tan, 2000, ApSS (in print).Google Scholar
Rodonò, M., Lanza, A. F. and Catalano, S., 1995, A&A 301, 75.Google Scholar
Warner, B. W., 1988, Nat 336, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar