Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:30:37.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planetary Nebulae and Related Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

Nino Panagia*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio di Radioastronomia, Bologna, Italy Laboratorio di Astrofisica Spaziale, Frascati (Roma), Italy

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This symposium is explicitly devoted to Planetary Nebulae which are associated to “dying” stars of moderate mass. All other bright nebulae in the Galaxy can be considered to be related to planetary nebulae in the sense that they are similar to planetary nebulae in many respects. However, in most cases, these “relatives”-nebulae correspond to astro-physical situations (as characterized by the evolutionary stage, chemical composition, physical parameters, etc.) which are completely different. A large variety of nebulae can be found in the sky. One goes from point-like objects like K3-50, which is a very compact HII region, or V1016 Cyg, possibly a proto-planetary nebula, through moderate size nebulae like the Crab Nebula (the famous supernova remnant, 5′ size) or the Orion Nebula (the famous HII region around the Trapezium stars, 3′ core), to large nebulae like the Trifid (HII region of 20′ size) or NGC 6888 (which is associated to a WN6 star, about 30′) and extremely large like the North America Nebula (NGC 7000, an emission-reflection nebula of about 2° size) and the Gum Nebula (probably a supernova remnant of approximately 36° diameter). We see that not only might they be different in size but also, and drastically, different in their physical nature. It is interesting to note, however, that as a rule nebulosities are found to accompany stars only in the early phases and in the very late phases of evolution. At this stage of the symposium we should have learned enough about nebulae related to old stars. Therefore, I have decided to talk about nebulae related to stars at the other end of evolution, that is classical HII regions. For convenience, I will use here the term “HII region” meaning implicitly an ionized nebula associated to, and ionized by, a young and massive star. By definition, these nebulae are interesting because they represent the first manifestation of new-born stars of high mass. In fact, in many cases one can detect an HII region (in the radio and/or in the infrared) well before being able to directly observe the exciting star.

Type
Session VII: The Origin of Planetary Nebulaesession VII the Origin of Planetary Nebulae
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1978 

References

Bieging, J., 1975, in “Lecture Notes in Physics - No. 42”, ed. by Wilson, T.L. and Downes, D., Springer-Verlag, p. 443.Google Scholar
Chopinet, M. and Lortet-Zuckermann, M.C., 1976, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 25, 179.Google Scholar
Churchwell, E., Terzian, Y. and Walmsley, M., 1976, Astron. Astrophys. 48, 331.Google Scholar
Conti, P.S., 1975, in “Lecture Notes in Physics - No. 42”, ed. by Wilson, T.L. and Downes, D., Springer-Verlag, p. 207.Google Scholar
Danziger, I.J., 1974, Astrophys. J. 193, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fusi-Pecci, F. and Renzini, A., 1976, Astron. Astrophys. 46, 447.Google Scholar
Georgelin, Y.M., 1975, Unpublished , Université de Provence, Observatoire de Marseille.Google Scholar
Georgelin, Y.M. and Georgelin, Y.P., 1976, Astron. Astrophys. 49, 57.Google Scholar
Gillett, F.C., Forrest, W.J., Merrill, K.M., Capps, R.W. and Soifer, B.T., 1975, Astrophys. J. 200, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S., 1975, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 170, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, F.P., 1976, Astron. Astrophys. 48, 193.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, E., 1973, Astrophys. J. 186, 899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macchetto, F. and Panagia, N., 1977, in preparation.Google Scholar
Mathis, J.S., 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufson, S.L., Lyon, J. and Marionni, P.A., 1975, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 201, L85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natta, A. and Panagia, N., 1976, Astron. Astrophys. 50, 19.Google Scholar
Panagia, N., 1973, Astron. J. 78, 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagia, N., 1974, Astrophys. J. 192, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagia, N., 1977, in “Infrared and Submillimeter Astronomy”, Fazio, G.G. (ed.), D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagia, N., Bussoletti, E. and Blanco, A., 1977a, in “CNO Isotopes in Astrophysics”, Audouze, J. (ed.), D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagia, N., Bussoletti, E. and Blanco, A., 1977b, to be submitted to Astron. Astrophys.Google Scholar
Panagia, N. and Vettolani, G., 1977, in preparation.Google Scholar
Perinotto, M., 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 39, 383.Google Scholar
Persson, S.E. and Frogel, J.A., 1974, Astrophys. J. 188, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soifer, B.T., Russell, R.W. and Merrill, K.M., 1976, Astrophys. J. 210, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stothers, R., 1976, Astrophys. 209, 800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn-Williams, C.G., Becklin, E.E., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G. and Werner, M.W., 1977, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 179, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckermann, B., Gilra, D.A., Turner, B.E., Morris, M. and Palmer, P., 1976, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 205, L15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar