Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:31:52.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optical Observations of four Balmer-Dominated Supernova Remnants in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

I. R. Tuohy ,
M. A. Dopita ,
D. S. Mathewson ,
K. S. Long  and
D. J. Helfand
I. R. Tuohy
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories
M. A. Dopita
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories
D. S. Mathewson
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories
K. S. Long
Affiliation:
Columbia University
D. J. Helfand
Affiliation:
Columbia University

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report the optical identification of four Balmer-dominated supernova remnants (SNRs) in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Both the Balmer-dominated spectra and the presence of a broad Hα component in one remnant can be understood in terms of a very high velocity non-radiative shock encountering gas which is partially neutral, as proposed originally by Chevalier and Raymond to account for the similar spectra of the galactic remnants, Tycho and SN1006. From a consideration of the optical and X-ray luminosities of the SNR with broad Hα emission, we infer that the fraction of neutral gas in the medium is ≲ 30%. Radio observations of the LMC remnants show that their surface brightnesses are anomalously low; this could be intrinsic to the supernova themselves, or a result of their environment. Finally, we argue that the four SNRs all resulted from Type I supernovae, in which case they are the first such remnants to be identified outside the Galaxy.

Type
VI. Supernova Remnants in Other Galaxies
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 101: Supernova Remnants and Their X-Ray Emission , 1983 , pp. 559 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983 

References

Caswell, J.L., and Lerche, I.: 1979, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 187, 201.Google Scholar
Chevalier, R.A., Kirshner, R.P., and Raymond, J.C.: 1980, Astrophys. J. 235, 186 (CKR).Google Scholar
Chevalier, R.A., and Raymond, J.C.: 1978, Astrophys. J. (Letters), 225, L27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J.N., Little, A.G., and Mills, B.Y.: 1976, Aust. J. Phys., Astrophys. Suppl., #40.Google Scholar
Gronenschild, E.H.B.M., and Mewe, R.: 1981, Preprint.Google Scholar
Long, K.S., Dopita, M.A., and Tuohy, I.R.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 260, 202.Google Scholar
Long, K.S., Helfand, D.J., and Grabelsky, D.A.: 1981, Astrophys. J., 248, 925.Google Scholar
Mathewson, D.S., Ford, V.L., Dopita, M.A., Tuohy, I.R., Long, K.S., and Helfand, D.J.: 1982, Astrophys. J. Suppl., in press.Google Scholar
Mathewson, D.S., Ford, V.L., Dopita, M.A., Tuohy, I.R., Long, K.S., and Helfand, D.J.: 1983, this volume, p. 553.Google Scholar
Mills, B.Y., and Crawford, D.F.: 1981, Private communication.Google Scholar
Tuohy, I.R., Dopita, M.A., Mathewson, D.S., Long, K.S., and Helfand, D.J.: 1982, Astrophys. J. in press.Google Scholar