Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:34:33.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Adoption of Empirical Corrections to Woolard's Nutation Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

D. D. McCarthy
Affiliation:
U. S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC 20390
P. K. Seidelmann
Affiliation:
U. S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC 20390
T. C. Van Flandern
Affiliation:
U. S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC 20390

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Commission 4 of the International Astronomical Union has deferred the question of revisions to the constants and theory of nutation in anticipation that there might be recommendations from Symposium No. 78 in Kiev. The present rigid-Earth theory of nutation does not adequately represent current precise astronomical observations for the major nutation terms. Discrepancies between the presently adopted theory and observations can accumulate to 0″1 in right ascension and significantly affect the determination of UT1 and materially influence the derivation of the new fundamental catalog of star positions and proper motions, FK5 There appears to be no obvious choice for a non-rigid-Earth model at present. The analysis of solid-Earth tides shows nutation coefficients in substantial agreement with astronomical observations and these values have been used in the reduction of radio interferometric and laser ranging observations. In the absence of a non-rigid-Earth model which can satisfy all requirements it is suggested that the coefficients found from the investigation of solid-Earth tides be adopted as a working standard until such a model can be adopted as a basis for nutation.

Type
Session II
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1980 

References

Billaud, G.: 1975, Private communication in Wako & Yokoyama (1976).Google Scholar
Fedorov, E. P.: 1958, Nutation as Derived from Latitude Observations, IAU Moscow, as reported in Jeffreys (1958).Google Scholar
Fedorov, E. P.: 1959, Astron. J., 64, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, E. P.: 1963, Nutation and Forced Motion of the Earth's Pole (The MacMillan Co., New York).Google Scholar
Gubanov, V. A.: 1969, Soviet Astronomy - A. J., 13, 529.Google Scholar
Guinot, B. and Feissel, M.: 1975, Private communication in Wako & Yokoyama (1976).Google Scholar
Hattori, T.: 1951, Pub. Astron. Soc. Japan, 3, 126.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.: 1930, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 90, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaks, W.: 1977, Pub. Inst. Geophys. Polish Acad. Science, F 2 (108), 75.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. and Vicente, R. O.: 1957a, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 117, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, H. and Vicente, R. O.: 1957b, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 117, 162.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H.: 1958, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 119, 7.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S.: 1939, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 99, 211.Google Scholar
Kakuta, C.: 1970, Pub. Astron. Soc. Japan, 22, 199.Google Scholar
Kulikov, K. A.: 1949, Astron. J. USSR, 26, 165.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. D.: 1972, Analysis of Washington Latitude Variations from 1915 to 1970 Using the Photographic Zenith Tube, Dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. D.: 1976, Astron. J., 81, 482.Google Scholar
Melchior, P.: 1972, “Past and Future of Research Methods in Problems of the Earth's Rotation,” in Rotation of the Earth, IAU Symposium No. 48, Melchior, P. and Yumi, S., eds. (D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland).Google Scholar
Molodensky, M. S.: 1961, Commun. Obs. Royal Belgique, No. 188.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. R.: 1943, Astron. J., 50, 125.Google Scholar
Pederson, G. H.: 1967, The Effect of the Fluid Core on Earth Tides, , .Google Scholar
Przybyllok, E.: 1920, Zentral Bureau der Internationalen Erdwessung Neue Folge der Veroffentlichungen, No. 36.Google Scholar
Tarady, V. K.: 1969, Astrometrija i Astrofiz, No. 2, 7.Google Scholar
Wako, Y. and Yokoyama, K.: 1976, “Nutation Terms Derived from Time and Latitude Observations,” paper presented to XVI General Assembly of IAU.Google Scholar
Woolard, E. W.: 1953, Astron. Papers Prepared for the Use of the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac, 15, Part 1.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, K.: 1975, private communication in Wako & Yokoyama (1976).Google Scholar