Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:11:19.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations of interstellar Lyman-α absorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Edward B. Jenkins
Edward B. Jenkins*
Affiliation:
Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, N.J., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Absorption at the Lyman-α transition from interstellar neutral hydrogen has been observed in the ultraviolet spectra of 18 nearby O and B stars. Radiation damping is the dominant cause of line broadening, which makes the derived line-of-sight column densities proportional to the square of the observed equivalent widths. An average hydrogen density on the order of 0.1 atom cm−3 has been found for most of the stars observed so far. This is in contrast to the findings from surveys of 21-cm radio emission, which suggest 0.7 atom cm−3 exists in the local region of the Galaxy. Several effects which might introduce uncertainties into the Lyman-α measurements are considered, but none seems to be able to produce enough error to explain the disagreement with the 21-cm data. The possibility that small-scale irregularities in the interstellar gas could give significantly lower values at Lyman-α is explored. However, a quantitative treatment of the factor of ten discrepancy in Orion indicates the only reasonable explanation requires the 21-cm flux to come primarily from small, dense, hot clouds which are well separated from each other. The existence of such clouds, however, poses serious theoretical difficulties.

Type
Part III: Interstellar Absorption and Emission
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 36: Ultraviolet Stellar Spectra and Related Ground-Based Observations , 1970 , pp. 281 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970 

References

Bok, B. J., Lawrence, R. S., and Menon, T. K.: 1955, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 67, 108.Google Scholar
Bowyer, C. S. and Field, G. B.: 1969, preprint.Google Scholar
Carruthers, G. R.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 151, 269.Google Scholar
Carruthers, G. R.: 1969, preprint.Google Scholar
Clark, B. G.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 1398.Google Scholar
Clark, B. G., Radhakrishnan, V., and Wilson, R. W.: 1962, Astrophys. J. 135, 151.Google Scholar
Fischel, D. and Stecher, T. P.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, L51.Google Scholar
FitzGerald, M. P.: 1968, preprint.Google Scholar
Garzoli, S. L. and Varsavsky, C. M.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 145, 79.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. J.: 1968, private communication.Google Scholar
Gosachinskii, I. V.: 1966, Soviet Astron. — AJ 9, 714.Google Scholar
Heeschen, D. S.: 1955, Astrophys. J. 121, 569.Google Scholar
Hickok, F. R. and Morton, D. C.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 152, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, L. M.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, 135.Google Scholar
Jenkins, E. B. and Morton, D. C.: 1967, Nature 215, 1257.Google Scholar
Jenkins, E. B., Morton, D. C., and Matilsky, T. A.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 158, 473.Google Scholar
Kerr, F. J. and Garzoli, S.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 152, 51.Google Scholar
Kerr, F. J. and Westerhout, G.: 1965, in Stars and Stellar Systems , Vol V; Galactic Structure (ed. by Blaauw, A. and Schmidt, M.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 167.Google Scholar
Knaap, H. F. P., Van den Meijdenberg, C. J. N., Beenakker, J. J. M., and Van de Hulst, H. C.: 1966, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherl. 18, 256.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, H. and Schmidt, K. H.: 1957, Astron. Nachr. 284, 71.Google Scholar
Lilley, A. E.: 1955, Astrophys. J. 121, 559.Google Scholar
McGee, R. X., Milton, J. A., and Wolfe, W.: 1966, Australian J. Phys., Astrophys. Suppl. no. 1.Google Scholar
Menon, T. K.: 1958, Astrophys. J. 127, 28.Google Scholar
Menon, T. K.: 1969, private communication.Google Scholar
Mészáros, P.: 1968, Astrophys. and Space Sci. 2, 510.Google Scholar
Morton, D. C.: 1967a, Astrophys. J. 147, 1017.Google Scholar
Morton, D. C.: 1967b, Astrophys. J. 150, 535.Google Scholar
Morton, D. C.: 1969a, Astrophys. J. 158, 629.Google Scholar
Morton, D. C.: 1969b, private communication.Google Scholar
Morton, D. C., Jenkins, E. B., and Brooks, N. H.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 155, 875.Google Scholar
Morton, D. C., Jenkins, E. B., and Bohlin, R. C.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, D. C., Jenkins, E. B., and Bohlin, R. C.: 1970, in Ultraviolet Stellar Spectra and Ground-Based Observations (ed. by Houziaux, L. and Butler, H.), Reidel Pub. Co., p. 138.Google Scholar
Muller, C. A.: 1959, in Paris Symposium on Radio Astron. (ed. by Bracewell, R. N.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif., p. 370.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, V. and Murray, J. D.: 1969, Proc. Astron. Soc. Australia 1, 215.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.: 1957, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherl. 13, 247.Google Scholar
Schwarz, U. J. and Van Woerden, H.: 1967, preprint (see also Van Woerden, 1967).Google Scholar
Shane, C. D. and Wirtanen, C. A.: 1967, Publ. Lick Obs. 22, part 1.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, I. S.: 1967, Soviet Astron. — AJ 11, 240.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M.: 1969, private communication.Google Scholar
Solomon, P. M. and Wickramasinghe, N. C.: 1969, preprint.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. and Zabriskie, F. R.: 1959, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 71, 412.Google Scholar
Stecher, T. P.: 1968, private communication.Google Scholar
Storer, S. H. and Sciama, D. W.: 1968, Nature 217, 1237.Google Scholar
Takakubo, K.: 1963, Sendai Astron. Rap. No. 86.Google Scholar
Van Bueren, H. G. and Oort, J. H.: 1968, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherl. 19, 414.Google Scholar
Van de Hulst, H. C., Muller, C. A., and Oort, J. H.: 1954, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherl. 12, 117.Google Scholar
Van Woerden, H.: 1967, in Radio Astronomy and the Galactic System, IAU Symposium No. 31 (ed. by Van Woerden, H.), Academic Press, New York, p. 3.Google Scholar
Varsavsky, C. M.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 153, 627.Google Scholar
Varshalovich, D. A.: 1967, Soviet Phys. JETP 25, 157.Google Scholar