Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:14:46.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Results from the Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) Mission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

R. P. Lin
R. P. Lin*
Affiliation:
Physics Department and Space Sciences Laboratory, Univ. of California/Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA 94720-7450

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The primary scientific objective of RHESSI Small Explorer mission is to investigate the physics of particle acceleration and energy release in solar flares, through imaging and spectroscopy of X-ray/gamma-ray continuum and gamma-ray lines emitted by accelerated electrons and ions, respectively. Here we briefly describe the mission and summarize the new solar observations, including the first hard X-ray imaging spectroscopy, the first high resolution spectroscopy of solar gamma-ray lines, and the first imaging of solar gamma-ray lines and continuum.

Type
Part 2: Results from New Instrumentation
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 219: Stars as Suns : Activity, Evolution and Planets , 2004 , pp. 41 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Alexander, D. & Metcalf, T. R. 1997, ApJ, 489, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschwanden, M. J. et al. 2000, ApJ, 535, 1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschwanden, M. J. et al. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, A. O. & Grigis, P. C. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. C. et al. 2002, Solar Phys, 210, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, H. V. et al. 2002, J. Geophys. Res., 107, SSH 14-1, CiteID 1315.Google Scholar
Coburn, W. & Boggs, S. 2003, Nature, 423, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, N. B. et al. 1993, Solar Phys., 143, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, J. F. et al. 2003, Science, 299, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emslie, A.G. 2003, ApJ, 595, L119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, P.T. et al. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, Nos. 1-2, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, P. T. et al. 2003 ApJ, 588, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golpaswamy, N. et al. 2002, ApJ, 572, 103.Google Scholar
Gordovsky, M. & Zharkova, V.V. 2003, National Astronomy Meeting (NAM), Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Holman, G. D. et al. 2003, ApJ, 595, L97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, G. H. & Curtis, D. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, G. et al. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, G.J. et al. 2003, ApJ Lett., 595, L77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, K. 2002, BAAS, 201, 69.01.Google Scholar
Johns, C. M. & Lin, R. P. 1992, Solar Phys., 137, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, S. 1999, ApJ, 428, 837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, S. R. & Anderson, K. A. 1970, ApJ, 162, 1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K.-L. et al., 2001.Google Scholar
Kosugi, et al. 1991, Solar Physics, 136, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krucker, S. et al. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, Nos. 1-2, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krucker, S. et al. 2003, ApJ, 595, L103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, D. et al. 2000, AGU, Spring Mtg, abstract #SH61A-09.Google Scholar
Lin, R. P. 1985, Solar Phys., 100, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. P. 1987, Reviews of Geophysics, 25, 676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. P. 1994, EOS Trans, AGU, 75, #40, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. P. & Hudson, H.S. 1976, Solar Phys., 50, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. P. et al. 1984, ApJ Lett., 251, L109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. P. et al. 1996, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. P. et al. 2001, ApJ, 557, L125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. P. et al. 2003, ApJ, 595, L69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makishima, et al. 1977, New Instrumentation for Space Astronomy, van der Hucht, K. A. & Vaiana, G. eds., New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Mandzhavidze, N. et al. 1999, ApJ, 518, 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, M. L. et al. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, Nos. 1-2, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, R. J. et al. 1991, ApJ, 371, 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oieroset, M. et al. 2002, Physical Sci. Rev., 89, id. 195001.Google Scholar
Piana, M. et al. 2003, ApJ, 595, L127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, T.A. et al. 1988, Solar Phys., 118, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, E. et al. 2002, AGU Fall Mtg., abstract #SH52A-0482.Google Scholar
Reames, D. V., 1996, ApJ Lett. 466, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reames, D. V. et al. 1985, ApJ Lett., 292, 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmahl, E. J. & Hurford, G. J. 2002, Solar Phys. 210, Nos 1-2, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, R. A. et al. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, G. H. et al. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, Nos. 1-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, G. H. et al. 2003, ApJ, 595, L89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, T. 1995, PASJ, 47, 251.Google Scholar
Smith, D. M. 2003, ApJ, 589, L55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. M. et al. 2003, ApJ, 595, L81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar