Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:30:51.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Near-IR Solar Coronal Observations with New-Technology Reflecting Coronographs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Raymond N. Smartt
Affiliation:
National Solar Observatory/Sacramento Peak, National Optical Astronomy Observatories,* Sunspot, New Mexico 88349, U.S.A.
Serge Koutchmy
Affiliation:
Institut d'Astrophysique, CNRS, 98 bis, Boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France
Jacques-Clair NoëNs
Affiliation:
Observatoires du Pic-du-midi et de Toulouse, 65200 Bagnères-de-Bigorre, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Emission-line and K-coronal observations in the IR have the significant advantage of reduced sky brightness compared with the visible, while the effects of seeing are also reduced. Moreover, strong lines are available in the near-IR. Examples of the current capabilities of IR coronal observations using conventional Lyot coronagraphs are discussed briefly. Photometric measurements using the two IR lines of Fe XIII (10,747 Å and 10,798 Å), together with the Fe XIII 3,388 Å line, have provided a valuable electron-density diagnostic, but with low-angular-resolution. The 10,747 Å line has high intrinsic polarization. It has been used for extensive coronal magnetic field measurements, but only the direction of the field, and that with modest angular resolution, has been achieved due basically to flux limitations. Such studies suffer from the lack of high angular resolution and high photon flux. Moreover, the chromatic properties of a singlet objective lens preclude simultaneous observations at widely-differing wavelengths of the important inner coronal region. A coronagraph based on a mirror objective avoids such problems. Further, comparatively high-resolution and high-sensitivity arrays are now available with quantum efficiencies up to 90%. Reflecting coronagraphs with advanced arrays then provide the possibility of obtaining high-resolution images in the infrared to carry out a wide variety of studies crucial to many of the outstanding problems in coronal physics. A program for the development of reflecting coronagraphs is described briefly, with an emphasis on applications to IR coronal studies.

Type
Part 7: Infrared Technology and the Future
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Altrock, R. C. (ed.): 1988, Solar and Stellar Coronal Structure and Dynamics, Proc. Ninth Sacramento Peak Summer Symposium, Sunspot, NM.Google Scholar
Antonucci, E., Gabriel, A. H., and Patchett, B. E.: 1984, Solar Phys. 93, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigg, E. K.: 1976, J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1080.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, H. E., Silver, M., and Ashley, E. J.: 1963, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, R. B.: 1971, in Macris, (ed.), Physics of the Solar Corona, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland, p. 114.Google Scholar
Elson, J. M., Bennett, H. E., and Bennett, J. M.: 1979, in Shanon, R. R. and Wyatt, J. C. (eds.), Applied Optics and Optical Engineering 7, Academic Press, New York, p. 191.Google Scholar
Halthore, R. N.: 1992 (private communication).Google Scholar
House, L. L.: 1972, Solar Phys. 23, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, L. L.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 214, 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, J. L., Reeves, E. M., and Kirkham, B.: 1978, in van der Hucht, K. A. and Vaiana, G. (eds.), New Instrumentation for Space Astronomy, Pergamon, New York, p. 91.Google Scholar
MacQueen, R. M., Gosling, J. T., Hildner, E., Munro, R. H., Poland, A. I., and Ross, C. L.: 1974, S.P.I.E. 44, 207.Google Scholar
Münch, G., Neugebauer, G., and McCammon, D.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 149, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noëns, J. C., Pageault, J., Ratier, G.: 1984, Solar Phys. 94, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawara, Y., Takano, T., Kato, T., Kosugi, T., Tsuneta, S., Watanabe, T., Kondo, I., and Uchida, Y.: 1991, Solar Phys. 136, 1 (see also complete issue of Solar Phys. 136/1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Querfeld, C. W.: 1977, S.P.I.E. 112, 200.Google Scholar
Querfeld, C. W.: 1982, AAS Photo. Bull. 29, 3.Google Scholar
Querfeld, C. W., and Smartt, R. N.: 1984, Solar Phys. 91, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheeley, N. R. Jr., Michels, D. J., Howard, R. A., and Koomen, M. J.: 1980, Astrophys. J. 237, L99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smartt, R. N.: 1979, S.P.I.E. 190, 58.Google Scholar
Smartt, R. N. and Koutchmy, S.: 1992, in Giampapa, M. and Bookbinder, J. (eds.), Seventh Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, ASP Conference Series Vol. 26, p. 660.Google Scholar
Smartt, R. N., Koutchmy, S. L., Colley, S. A., Caron, R., Schwenn, R., and Restaino, S. R.: 1990, S.P.I.E. 1236, 206.Google Scholar
Smartt, R. N.: 1992, in Space '92, Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 31 May - 4 June, 1992, Denver, CO (in press).Google Scholar
Smartt, R. N., and Zhang, Z.: 1987, in Athay, G. and Spicer, D. S. (eds.), Theoretical Problems in High Resolution Solar Physics II, NASA Conf. Pub. 2483, p. 129.Google Scholar
Zuev, V. E.: 1970, Atmospheric Transparency in the Visible and the Infrared, Keter Press, Jerusalem.Google Scholar