Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:34:24.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiplicity in T and OB Associations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2016

Rainer Köhler
Affiliation:
Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
Wolfgang Brandner
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Dr., Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The results of binary surveys among T Tauri stars in the T associations Taurus-Auriga and Chamaeleon, and in the OB association Scorpius-Centaurus are summarized, and implications on our understanding on the formation of binary and multiple systems are discussed.

Type
V. Pre-Main Sequence Binary Populations
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2001 

References

Alcalá, J. M., Krautter, J., Covino, E., Neuhäuser, R., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Wichmann, R. 1996, A&A, 319, 184.Google Scholar
Bate, M. R. 1997, MNRAS, 285, 16.Google Scholar
Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A. 1997, MNRAS, 285, 33.Google Scholar
Blaauw, A. 1991, in The Physics of Star Formation and Early Stellar Evolution, ed. Lada, C. J. & Kylafis, N. D. Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, P., Burkert, A., Klein, R. I., Boss, A. P. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, ed. Mannings, V., Boss, A. P. & Russell, S. S., 675.Google Scholar
Boss, A. P. 1997, ApJ, 483, 309.Google Scholar
Brandner, W., Köhler, R. 1998, ApJ, 499, L79.Google Scholar
Brandner, W., Alcalá, J. M., Kunkel, M., Moneti, A., Zinnecker, H. 1996, A&A, 307, 121.Google Scholar
Brandner, W., Zinnecker, H., Alcalá, J. M., Allard, F., Covino, E., Frink, S., Köhler, R., Kunkel, M., Moneti, A., Schweitzer, A. 2000, AJ, in press (August issue).Google Scholar
Duquennoy, A., Mayor, M. 1991, A&A, 248, 455.Google Scholar
Durisen, R., Sterzik, M. 1994, A&A, 286, 84.Google Scholar
Frink, S., Röser, S., Alcalá, J. M., Covino, E., Brandner, W. 1998, A&A, 338, 442.Google Scholar
Ghez, A. M., Neugebauer, G., Matthews, K. 1993, AJ, 106, 2005.Google Scholar
Ghez, A. M., McCarthy, D. W., Patience, J. L., Beck, T. L. 1997, ApJ, 481, 378.Google Scholar
Köhler, R., Leinert, Ch. 1998, A&A, 331, 977.Google Scholar
Köhler, R., Kunkel, M., Leinert, Ch., Zinnecker, H. 2000, A&A, 356, 541.Google Scholar
Kunkel, M., Brandner, W., Yorke, H. W., Zinnecker, H. et al. 2001, in prep.Google Scholar
Leinert, Ch., Zinnecker, H., Weitzel, N., Christou, J., Ridgway, S. T., Jameson, R., Haas, M., Lenzen, R. 1993, A&A, 278, 129.Google Scholar
Miller, G. E., Scalo, J. M. 1978, PASP, 90, 506.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch. 1977, ApJ, 211, 147.Google Scholar
Simon, M., Ghez, A. M., Leinert, Ch., Cassar, L., Chen, W. P., Howell, R. R., Jameson, R. F., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., Richichi, A. 1995, ApJ, 443, 625.Google Scholar
Ungerechts, H., Thaddeus, P. 1987, ApJS, 63, 645.Google Scholar
Walter, F. M., Vrba, F. J., Mathieu, R. D., Brown, A., Myers, P. C. 1994, AJ, 107, 692.Google Scholar
Wichmann, R., Krautter, J., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Neuhäuser, R., Alcalá, J. M., Zinnecker, H., Wagner, R. M., Mundt, R., Sterzik, M. F. 1996, A&A, 312, 439.Google Scholar