Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:08:03.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Models for the Emission-Line Spectra of the Low-Excitation Herbig-Haro Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Michael A. Dopita
Affiliation:
Mt. Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, Australian National University
Saul Caganoff
Affiliation:
Mt. Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, Australian National University
Richard D. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Missouri, St. Louis
Martin Cohen
Affiliation:
NASA-Ames Research Center and Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The class of Low-Excitation Herbig-Haro Objects are characterised by [SII] and [OI] lines which are comparable in strength to H-Alpha, by [NI] lines that are comparable to H-Beta, relatively weak [NII] and [OII] lines, little or no [OIII] emission and a very strong blue-UV “excess”. This blue and UV continuum in low-excitation HH Objects was noted as a problem by Brugel, Böhm and Mannery (1981), Ortalani and D'Odorico (1980) and Böhm, Böhm-Vitense and Brugel (1981). The first suggestion that it results from collisionally enhanced Hydrogen two-photon (2q) continuum was by Dopita (1981). The subsequent observations of Dopita, Binette and Schwartz (1982) proved that this was indeed the case. However, although very close correlations between this enhancement and the emission-line spectrum were found, a fair theoretical description could only be obtained for very youthful shock models with ages of order 30 years. However, there seems to be no reason why low excitation HH shocks should be much younger than the high excitation shocks.

Type
I. Star Forming Processes in the Solar Neighborhood
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Böhm, K.H., Böhm-Vitense, E. and Brugel, E.W. 1981. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 245, L113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugel, E.W., Böhm, K.H. and Mannery, E. 1981. Astrophys. J. 243, 874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dopita, M.A. 1981. in Exploring the Universe, Ed. Kahn, F.D., Dordrecht; Reidel Google Scholar
Dopita, M.A., Binette, L. and Schwartz, R.D. 1982. Astrophys. J. 261, 183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dopita, M.A., Binette, L. and Tuohy, I.R. 1984. Astrophys. J. 282, 142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, H. 1981a. Publ Ast. Soc. Japan 33, 121 Google Scholar
Itoh, H. 1981b. Publ. Ast. Soc. Japan 33, 521 Google Scholar
McKee, C.F. 1974. Astrophys. J. 188, 335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohtani, H. 1980. Publ. Ast. Soc. Japan 32, 11 Google Scholar
Ortolani, S. and D'Odorico, S. 1980. Astron. Astrophys. 83, L8 Google Scholar
Pravdo, S.H. and Smith, B.W. 1979. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 234, L195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, R.D., Dopita, M.A. and Cohen, M. 1985. Astron. J. 90, 1820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar