Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:45:31.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A κ-ϵ Model of the Lower Overshoot Layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

K. Petrovay*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One region where discrepancies between the seismic and standard solar models continue to exist is the overshoot layer below the convective zone (Gough et al. 1996). A main reason for this discrepancy is clearly the lack of a realistic physical model for astrophysical overshoot. Beside numerical experiments, the most promising approach to the construction of such a model is based on the Reynolds-stress formalism of turbulence theory (Speziale 1991). As a first step toward the development of a more complete Reynolds stress model of the overshoot, here we present a simple κ-ϵ model, valid under the following conditions:

  1. (a). Incompressibility: iVi = 0. Owing to the short length scale (cf. Fig. 1), this assumption is somewhat better founded here than in other models.

  2. (b). Closure: Let and . (w = vz vertical velocity; κ ≡ V2/2: kinetic energy; ϵ: dissipation rate). Now assume Cwk = const., Cwt =const. This is warranted if l/Hv ≃constant (Hv: scale height of V2), which will be seen indeed to be the case in our model, cf. eqs. (3)–(4).

  3. (c). No correlation with thermodynamic fluctuations: . The assumption implies that these correlations vanish in a very thin (≪ Hp) transition layer below △▽ = 0. No change in the geometrical flow properties is expected in such a thin layer, so lo, Cwk, and C should be the same as in the lower part of the unstable layer. On the basis of numerical experiments here we use lo = HP, Cwk = 0.6, C = 3, q = 2.4. (The index ‘0’ refers to values at z = 0 i.e. at △▽ = 0.) Note however that V may be significantly reduced in the transition layer, so Vo (and thus ) is undetermined in the present model.

Type
II. Solar Convection and Variation of Irradiance
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1998 

References

Gough, D. O. et al. 1996, Science, 272, 1296 Google Scholar
Speziale, C. G. 1991, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 23, 107 Google Scholar