Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:43:37.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring the Masses of Young Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2016

Michal Simon*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY, 17794–3800, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents the masses of young stars measured by the rotation of their circumstellar disks (Simon, Dutrey, and Guilloteau 2000). Their precision is good enough to enable meaningful tests of theoretical models of pre-main sequence evolution. The tests are however limited by the imprecision with which the distances to the stars are known. The astrometric instruments now being developed have the potential to remove this limitation.

Type
XI. Young Binaries and Stellar Astrophysics
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2001 

References

Baraffe, I. et al. 1998, A&A, 337, 403 (BCAH).Google Scholar
Casey, B. W. et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1617.Google Scholar
Covino, E. et al. 2000, IAU 200 Poster Proc.1 , 9.Google Scholar
D'Antona, F. Mazzitelli, I. 1994, ApJS, 90, 467.Google Scholar
D'Antona, F. & Mazzitelli, I. 1997, Mem. S. A. It., 68, 807.Google Scholar
Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., & Simon, M. 1994, A&A 286, 149.Google Scholar
Dutrey, A. et al. 1998, A&A, 338, L63.Google Scholar
Favata, F. et al. 1998, A&A, 335, 218.Google Scholar
Ghez, A. M. et al. 1995, AJ, 10, 753.Google Scholar
Grady, C. 1999, priv. comm..Google Scholar
Guilloteau, S. & Dutrey, A. 1998, A&A, 339, 467.Google Scholar
Guilloteau, S., Dutrey, A, & Simon, M. 1999, A&A, 348, 570.Google Scholar
Hartigan, P., Strom, K. M., & Strom, S. E. 1994, ApJ, 452, 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heintz, W. D. 1978, Double Stars, (Dordrecht:Reidel)Google Scholar
Hummel, C. A. 2000, IAU 200 Poster Proc.1 , 154.Google Scholar
Kenyon, S. J., Dobryzycka, D., & Hartmann, L. 1994, AJ, 108, 1872.Google Scholar
Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann, L. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117.Google Scholar
Koresko, C. D. et al. 1998, ApJ, 509, L45.Google Scholar
Luhman, K. L. 1999, ApJ 525, 466.Google Scholar
Malfait, K. et al. 1998, A&A 331, 211.Google Scholar
Mamajek, E. E., Lawson, W. A., & Feigelson, E. D. 2000, preprint.Google Scholar
Mannings, V., & Sargent, A. I. 1997, ApJ, 490, 792.Google Scholar
Mathieu, R. D. 1994, ARAA, 32, 465.Google Scholar
Mazeh, T., Prato, L., & Simon, M. 2000, IAU 200 Poster Proc.1 , 22.Google Scholar
Palla, F. & Stahler, S. 1999, ApJ, 525, 772 (PS99).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prato, L. A. 1998, PhD Thesis, SUNY-SB.Google Scholar
Quast, G. R. et al. 2000, IAU 200 Poster Proc.1 , 28.Google Scholar
Reipurth, B. et al. 2000, IAU 200 Poster Proc.1 , 25.Google Scholar
Siess, L., Dufour, E., & Forestini, M. 2000, A&A, in press.Google Scholar
Simon, M. 1996, ApJ, 469, 890.Google Scholar
Simon, M., Dutrey, A., & Guilloteau, S. 2000, ApJ, submitted.Google Scholar
Steffen, A. et al. 2000, IAU 200 Poster Proc.1 , 19.Google Scholar
Swenson, F. J. et al. 1994, ApJ, 425, 286.Google Scholar
Thiébaut, E. 1995, A&A, 304, L17.Google Scholar
Torres, G., Stefanik, R. P., & Latham, D. W. 1997, ApJ, 485, 167.Google Scholar
Torres, C. A. O. et al. 2000, IAU 200 Poster Proc.1 , 118.Google Scholar
van den Ancker, M. E. et al. 1998, A&A, 330, 145.Google Scholar
White, R. J. et al. 1999, ApJ, 520, 811.Google Scholar