Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T04:51:31.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A lower limit to the magnetic field in the Crab Nebula from cosmic γ-ray experiments at 1011 eV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

G. G. Fazio ,
H. F. Helmken ,
G. H. Rieke  and
T. C. Weekes
G. G. Fazio
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and Harvard College Observatory, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.
H. F. Helmken
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and Harvard College Observatory, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.
G. H. Rieke
Affiliation:
Mt. Hopkins Observatory, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Amado, Arizona, and Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.
T. C. Weekes
Affiliation:
Mt. Hopkins Observatory, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Amado, Arizona, and Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The 10-m optical reflector at Mt. Hopkins, Arizona, has been used to search for cosmic γ-Rays by the detection of atmospheric Čerenkov radiation from energetic particle showers. Approximately 100 drift scans of the Crab Nebula during 1968–69 have yielded no positive evidence of a γ-Ray flux. The upper limit to the flux at 1.7 × 1011 eV is 2.0 × 10−10 photons/cm2 sec. Assuming γ-Rays of this energy are produced by Compton scattering, a lower limit on the average magnetic field in the Crab Nebula is 1.5 × 10−4 gauss. This experiment also verifies previous evidence that the high-energy electrons in the Crab Nebula are not the secondary products of high-energy proton interactions but must have been accelerated from lower energies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 37: Non-Solar X- and Gamma-Ray Astronomy , 1970 , pp. 250 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970 

References

Apparao, M. V. K.: 1967, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 65A, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudakov, A. E., Dadykin, V. L., Zatsepin, V. I., and Nesterova, N. M.: 1965, in Proc. (Trudy), Lebedev Physics Inst. (ed. by Skobel'tsyn, D. V.), Consultants Bureau, New York, 26, 99.Google Scholar
Cocconi, G.: 1960, Proc. Intl. Conf. Cosmic Rays, Moscow, 2, 309.Google Scholar
Fazio, G. G., Helmken, H. F., Rieke, G. H., and Weekes, T. C.: 1968, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 154, L83.Google Scholar
Fegan, D. J., McBreen, B., O'Mongain, E. P., Porter, N. A., and Slevin, P. J.: 1968, Canadian J. Phys. 46, S433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, R. J.: 1965, Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 577.Google Scholar
Gould, R. J. and Burbidge, G. R.: 1967, Handbuch der Physik 46/II, 265.Google Scholar
Long, C. D., McBreen, B., Porter, N. A., and Weekes, T. C.: 1965, Proc. Intl. Conf. Cosmic Rays, London 1, 318.Google Scholar
Rieke, G. H.: 1969, Smithson. Astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rep. No. 301.Google Scholar
Rieke, G. H. and Weekes, T. C.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 155, 429.Google Scholar
Tornabene, H. S. and Cusimano, F. J.: 1968, Canadian J. Phys. 46, S81.Google Scholar