Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:19:41.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Frequency Cutoffs in the Spectra of Radioquiet Quasars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

R. Antonucci
Affiliation:
The Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, MD 21218
R. Barvainis
Affiliation:
National Radio Astronomy Observatory Edgemont Road Charlottesville, VA 22901

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radio-quiet and normal radio-loud quasars have very similar spectral properties in the ultraviolet, optical and near infrared regions, but their radio powers differ by several orders of magnitude. Somewhere between the near infrared and the radio their spectra must diverge dramatically.

The IRAS survey detected 17 radio quiet quasars and luminous Seyfert 1's with −29. 5 ≤ Mv ≤ −21.6 (for Ho = 75). By coadding the survey data and using pointed observations, we have detections of most of these objects in all four IRAS passbands. The spectra are all rising with wavelength all the way to 100μ. We are measuring fluxes in the centimeter, millimeter, and, together with R Cutri, the near infrared and optical regions for each of these objects. Our goal is to constrain the location, shape, and spectral context of the low frequency cutoffs. Here we present the IRAS, millimeter and centimeter data. Measurements at the other wavelengths are still in progress.

Although the spectra are rising steeply between 60μ and 100μ, we find that all of our objects are undetectable at 1.3 mm with the NRAO 12-m telescope. Our limits are typically an order of magnitude below the 100μ fluxes. (Ennis et al (1982) and Robson et al (1985) have already shown that the 1 mm fluxes of some radio quiet quasars must be below the extrapolation of the near infrared continuum.) Our objects are all extremely weak or undetected with the VLA at 2 cm and 1.3 cm, at levels typically three orders of magnitude below the 100μ fluxes. The sharpness of the required cutoffs allows us to rule out the hypothesis that the infrared is synchrotron radiation with the cutoff due to an absence of low energy electrons. The high frequency of the cutoffs makes free-free absorption implausible, but not impossible. It is possible that synchrotron self-absorption is suppressing the radio. There is circumstantial evidence that the far infrared is thermal dust emission. This would require a lower cutoff in the distribution of dust temperatures, which we think we can explain.

Type
III. Seyfert Galaxies
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Aitken, D. K. and Roche, P. F. 1985, MNRAS, 213, 777.Google Scholar
Band, D. L. and Grindlay, J. E. 1986, preprint.Google Scholar
Burstein, D. and Lebofsky, M. J. 1986, Ap. J., 301, 683.Google Scholar
Condon, J. J., O'Dell, S. L., Puschell, J. J. and Stein, W. A. 1981, Ap. J., 246, 624.Google Scholar
Ennis, D. J., Neugebauer, G. and Werner, M. 1982, Ap. J., 262, 460.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, R. H., Whitcomb, S. E., Winston, R., Steining, R. F., Harper, D. A. and Moseley, S. H. 1977, Ap. J., 216, 698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, M., Lester, D. F., Harvey, P. M. and Frueh, M. 1986 preprint.Google Scholar
Kwan, J. and Krolik, J. H. 1981, Ap. J., 250, 478.Google Scholar
Pozdnyakov, L. A., Sobel, I. M. and Syunyaev, R. A. 1979, Sov. Astron. Lett., 5, 149.Google Scholar
Rees, M. J., Silk, J. I., Werner, M. W. and Wickramasinghe, N. C. 1969, Nature, 223, 788.Google Scholar
Robson, E. I., Gear, W. K., Smith, M. G., Ado, P. A. R. and Nolt, I. G. 1985, MNRAS, 213, 355.Google Scholar
Rudmick, L., Jones, T. W. and Fiedler, R. 1986, Ap. J., 91, 1011.Google Scholar