Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:05:36.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lopsided Galaxies and the Satellite Accretion Rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Dennis Zaritsky  and
Hans-Walter Rix
Dennis Zaritsky
Affiliation:
UCO/Lick Observatory and Univ. of Calif. Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Hans-Walter Rix
Affiliation:
Steward Observatory, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although current observations and theoretical models indicate that galaxy mergers and interactions are catalysts in the process of galaxy evolution, we have only a limited quantitative understanding of some basic aspects of the process. For example, the rate at which galaxies merge is poorly constrained. We can simplify the problem by considering only disk galaxies, which because of the fragility of their disks (cf. Tóth and Ostriker 1992) have presumably not suffered a major merger. Even so, these galaxies have almost certainly experienced the infall of small companion galaxies at some time. The Milky Way is currently experiencing the accretion of the Sagittarius dwarf (Ibata, Gilmore, & Irwin 1994) and will eventually accrete the Magellanic Clouds (Tremaine 1976). To understand how galaxies evolve, we need to have quantitative knowledge of the accretion rate as a function of mass for all types of galaxies. Here we consider only the accretion of companion galaxies (~ 10% by mass) onto large spiral galaxies.

Type
Tidal Interactions
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 186: Galaxy Interactions at High and Low Redshift , 1999 , pp. 117 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1999 

References

Baldwin, J., Lynden-Bell, D., & Sancisi, R., (1980), MNRAS, 193 313 Google Scholar
Bruzual, A. G., & Chariot, S. (1993), ApJ, 405, 538 Google Scholar
Ibata, R.A., Gilmore, G., & Irwin, M.J. (1993), Nature, 370, 194 Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R.C. et al. (1987), AJ, 93, 1011 Google Scholar
Larson, R.B., & Tinsley, B.M. (1978), ApJ, 370, 194 Google Scholar
Lavery, R.J., & Henry, J.P. (1988), ApJ, 330, 596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, C., Persson, S.E., & Mathews, K. (1984), ApJL, 287, 95L Google Scholar
Richter, O., & Sancisi, R (1994), AA, 290, 9 Google Scholar
Rix, H.-W., & Zaritsky, D. (1995), ApJ, 447, 82 Google Scholar
Sellwood, J.A., & Valluri, M. (1997), MNRAS, 287, 124 Google Scholar
Tóth, G., & Ostriker, J.P. (1992), ApJ, 389, 5 Google Scholar
Walker, I.R., Mihos, J.C., & Hernquist, L.(1996), ApJ, 460, 121 Google Scholar
Weinberg, M. (1994), ApJ, 421, 481 Google Scholar
Zaritsky, D., & Rix, H.-W. (1997), Ap. J., 448, L17 Google Scholar
Zaritsky, D., & Rix, H.-W. (1997), Ap. J., 477, 118 Google Scholar