Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T12:29:40.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hyades Cluster Distance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Robert B. Hanson
Robert B. Hanson*
Affiliation:
Royal Greenwich Observatory, Herstmonceux Castle, Hailsham, East Sussex BN27 1RP, England

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper reviews recent astrometric progress in determining the Hyades cluster distance, emphasizing critical assessment of the precision and accuracy of the observations. Substantial improvement in the trigonometric parallaxes yields a mean Hyades distance modulus m - M = 3.25 ± 0.08 mag, nearly twice as precise as previous parallax results. New proper motions from three independent sources yield a mean distance modulus 3.31 ± 0.06 mag. The close agreement of the recent astrometric results suggests that the overall mean Hyades distance modulus 3.30 mag may be used with confidence in cosmic distance scale calibrations.

Type
August 27 Introduction, Associations, Galactic Structure
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 85: Star Clusters , 1980 , pp. 71 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1980 

References

Argue, A.N., and Kenworthy, C.M.: 1972, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 159, p.31.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.S.: 1977, Neighborhood Meeting on the Distance Scale, Yale University.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.S.: 1979, personal communication.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.S., Corbin, T.E., and Schmidt, R.E.: 1975, Bull. AAS 7, p.435.Google Scholar
Corbin, T.E.: 1974, Astron. J. 79, p.885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, T.E., Smith, D.L., and Carpenter, M.S.: 1975, Bull. AAS 7, p.337.Google Scholar
Corbin, T.E.: 1979, personal communication.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J.: 1967, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 5, p.105.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 158, p.1109.Google Scholar
Griffin, R.F., and Gunn, J.E.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 191, p.545.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.B.: 1975, Astron. J. 80, p.379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R.B.: 1976, “Recent Progress on the Hyades Distance Problem”, Commission 24, Photographic Astrometry, IAU, Grenoble.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.B.: 1977, Bull. AAS 9, p.585.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.B.: 1978, in IAU Colloq. No. 48, “Modern Astrometry”, p.31.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.B.: 1979, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 186, p.875.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.B., and Lutz, T.E.: 1979, in preparation.Google Scholar
Harrington, R.S., Dahn, C.C., Miranian, M., Riepe, B.Y. Christy, J.W., Guetter, H.H., Ables, H.D., Hewitt, A.V., Vrba, F.J., and Walker, R.L.: 1978, Publ. U.S. Naval Obsy. 24, part 4.Google Scholar
Hill, G., and Morris, S.C.: 1976, Quart. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 17, p.503.Google Scholar
H⊘g, E.: 1979, Observatory 99, p.78.Google Scholar
IAU: 1979, Proc. of Commission 24, Photographic Astrometry, in press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, L.F.: 1963, “General Catalogue of Trigonometric Stellar Paralflaxes”, Yale University Observatory, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Klemola, A.R., Harlan, E.A., McNamara, B., and Wirtanen, C.A.: 1975, Astron. J. 80, p.642.Google Scholar
Lutz, T.E.: 1978, in IAU Colloq. No. 48, “Modem Astrometry” p.7.Google Scholar
Lutz, T.E., and Kelker, D.H.: 1973, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 85, p.573.Google Scholar
Morris, S.C.: 1979, personal communication.Google Scholar
Murray, C.A.: 1979, personal communication.Google Scholar
Pels, G., Oort, J.H., and Pels-Kluyver, H.A.: 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 43, p.423.Google Scholar
Prochazka, F.V., and Tucker, R.H.: 1978, (eds.), IAU Colloq. No. 48, “Modern Astrometry”, University Observatory, Vienna.Google Scholar
Scales, B.G.F.: 1979, in preparation.Google Scholar
Upgren, A.R.: 1974a, Astron. J. 79, p.651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upgren, A.R.: 1974b, Astrophys. J. 193, p.359.Google Scholar
Upgren, A.R., and Carpenter, K.G.: 1977, Astron. J. 82, p.227.Google Scholar
Upgren, A.R., and Weis, E.W.: 1977, Astron. J. 82, p.978.Google Scholar
Upton, E.K.L.: 1970, Astron. J. 75, p.1097.Google Scholar
van Altena, W.F.: 1969, Astron. J. 74, p.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Altena, W.F.: 1973, in IAU Symp. No. 54, “Problems of Calibration of Absolute Magnitudes and Temperature of Stars”, p.23.Google Scholar
van Altena, W.F.: 1974a, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific. 86, p.217.Google Scholar
van Altena, W.F.: 1974b, Astron. J. 79, p.826.Google Scholar
van Altena, W.F.: 1978, in IAU Colloq. No. 48, “Modern Astrometry”, p.79.Google Scholar
van Bueren, H.G.: 1952, Bull. Astr. Inst. Neth. 11, p.385.Google Scholar
Vasilevskis, S.: 1962, Astron. J. 67, p.699.Google Scholar
Vasilevskis, S.: 1966, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 7, p.57.Google Scholar
Vasilevskis, S., Harlan, E.A., Klemola, A.R., and Wirtanen, C.A.: 1975, Publ. Lick Obsy. 22, part 5.Google Scholar
Wayman, P., Symms, L.S.T., and Blackwell, K.: 1965, Roy. Obsy. Bull. No. 98.Google Scholar