Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:34:50.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Evolution: the View from Saturn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Misia Landau
Misia Landau*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Boston University, 232 Bay State Road, Boston MA 02215

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The evolution of bipedalism is considered a critical step in human evolution. To discover how it occurred, and whether it could have occurred elsewhere in the universe, scientists must study the structure of their theories as well as fossils. In particular, they must determine whether such critical steps are a function of the “data” or of the (often unwitting) use of narrative for, it will be shown, scientists tend to make sense of the past by telling stories in which everything leads up to or away from being human.

Type
Section IV. Universal Aspects of Biological Evolution
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 112: The Search for Extraterrestrial Life: Recent Developments , 1985 , pp. 213 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985 

References

1. Huxley, L. 1900. Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley. v. 1. D. Appleton & Co., New York, p.192 Google Scholar
2. Huxley, T.H. 1959. Man's Place in Nature, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. p.85.Google Scholar
3. Pilbeam, D. 1984. ‘The origin of hominoids and hominids.’ Am. Sci. 250: 84–96.Google Scholar
4. Carter, B. 1983. ‘The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution.’ Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A310: 1Google Scholar
5. Ibid., p.362 Google Scholar
6. Stern, J. and Sussman, R., 1983. ‘The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis.’ Am J. Phys. Anth. 60(3): 279–317 Google Scholar
7. Landau, M. 1984. ‘Human evolution as narrative.’ American Scientist. 72: 262–268.Google Scholar
8. Mink, L. 1978. ‘Narrative form as a cognitive instrument,’ in The Writing of History. Literary Form and Historical Understanding. Canary, R.H. & Kozicki, H., eds. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. p. 197–198.Google Scholar
9. Engels, F. 1940. ‘The part played by labor in the transition from ape to man,’ in The Dialectics of Nature. Lawrence & Wishart, London.Google Scholar
10. Gould, S.J. 1977. ‘Posture maketh man.’ in Ever Since Darwin. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
11. Haeckel, E. 1868. The History of Creation. D. Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
12. Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London. p.141.Google Scholar
13. Hewes, G. 1961. ‘Food transport and the origin of hominid bipedalism.’ Am. Anth. 63 (14): 687–710.Google Scholar
14. See Dart, R.A. 1956. ‘Cultural status of the South African Man-Apes.’ Smithsonian Rept. for 1955. Smithsonian Institution, Washington Google Scholar
Washburn, S.L. 1960. ‘Tools and human evolution.’ Sci. Am. 203 (3): 63–75.Google Scholar
15. Jolly, C.J. 1970. ‘The seed-eaters: a new model of hominid differentiation based on a baboon analogy.’ Man 5: 21.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., p. 22.Google Scholar
17. Lovejoy, C.O. 1981. ‘The origin of man.’ Science 211: 341–350.Google Scholar
18. Forster, E.M. 1954. Aspects of the Novel. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York. p.48.Google Scholar
19. Rose, M.D. 1984. ‘Food acquisition and the evolution of positional behaviour: the case of bipedalism,’ in Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates. ed. Chivers, D.J., Wood, B.A. and Bilsborough, A., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
20. Rose, M.D. 1983. ‘Miocene hominoid postcranial morphology: monkey-like, ape-like, neither, or both?’ in New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry, ed. Ciochon, R.L. and Corruccini, R.S., Plenum, N.Y. pp. 405–417.Google Scholar