No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Gross Dynamics of the Interstellar Medium
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2017
Extract
This paper reviews the many, by now familiar, processes that have at various times been attributed to the interstellar motions, in an effort to piece together some over-all picture of the grosser dynamical relations which might be expected to apply to the motions of the material and electromagnetic fields between the stars. We are interested in numerical values for the material densities, velocity fields, magnetic fields, etc., and we should also like to know to what extent the observed properties of the different fields are dependent upon each other.
- Type
- Part II: Theoretical Considerations on the Production and Dissipation of Velocity Fields in the Interstellar Medium
- Information
- Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 8: Cosmical Gas Dynamics , July 1958 , pp. 955 - 965
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Physical Society 1958
References
1 Spitzer, L. and Savedoff, M. P., Astrophys. J. 111, 593 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Spitzer, L., Astrophys. J. 120, 1 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Chapman, S., Astrophys. J. 120, 151 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Schlüter, A., Z. Naturforsch. 5a, 72 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Cowling, T. G., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A183, 453 (1945).Google Scholar
6 Cowling, T. G. in The Sun , edited by Kuiper, G. P. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1953).Google Scholar
7 Spitzer, L., The Physics of Fully Ionized Gases (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1956).Google Scholar
8 Fermi, E., Phys. Rev. 75, 1169 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Fermi, E., Astrophys. J. 119, 1 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Davis, L. and Greenstein, J., Astrophys. J. 114, 206 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Spitzer, L. and Tukey, J. W., Astrophys. J. 114, 186 (1951).Google Scholar
12 Hiltner, W. A., Astrophys. J. 109, 471 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Hiltner, W. A., Astrophys. J. 114, 241 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗ The interpretation of Davis and Greenstein10 seems to be in better accord with the facts than that of Spitzer and Tukey.11 Google Scholar
14 Davis, L. Jr., Phys. Rev. 81, 890 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Chandrasekhar, S. and Fermi, E., Astrophys. J. 118, 113 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Pickelner, S. B., Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk. 58, 285 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Elsasser, W. M., Phys. Rev. 95, 1 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Cowling, T. G., Magnetohydrodynamics (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1957).Google Scholar
19 Spitzer, L., Astrophys. J. 116, 299 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Chew, , Goldberger, , and Low, , Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A236, 112 (1956).Google Scholar
21 Watson, K. M., Phys. Rev. 102, 12 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Brueckner, K. A. and Watson, K. M., Phys. Rev. 102, 19 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Parker, E. N., Phys. Rev. 107, 924 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Parker, E. N., Phys. Rev. 109, 1328 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Oort, J. H., Astrophys. J. 116, 233 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Blaauw, A., Bull. Astron. Soc. Neth. 11, 405 (1952).Google Scholar
† For a discussion of the dynamical properties of dust grains per se, see the basic works of Spitzer2,27–30 and Whipple.31 We mention the dust striations here only as a means toward estimating the galactic field.Google Scholar
27 Spitzer, L., Astrophys. J. 93, 369 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Spitzer, L., Astrophys. J. 94, 232 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 Spitzer, L., Harvard Observatory Monograph No. 7, Centennial Symposia.Google Scholar
30 Spitzer, L., Astrophys. J. 111, 593 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Whipple, F. L., Astrophys. J. 104, 1 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Adams, W. S., Astrophys. J. 97, 105 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Oort, J. H., Bull. Astron. Soc. Neth. 12, 177 (1954).Google Scholar
34 Ginzburg, V. L., Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk. 51, 343 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Ginzburg, V. L., Fortschr. Physik (Berlin) 1, 659 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Ginzburg, V. L., Doklady Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 99, 703 (1954).Google Scholar
37 Ginzburg, V. L., Izvest. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. Ser. Fiz. 20, 5 (1956).Google Scholar
38 Alfvén, H. and Herlofson, N., Phys. Rev. 78, 616 (1950); Kiepenheuer, K. O., Phys. Rev. 79, 738 (1950); Shklovsky, I. S., Doklady Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 90, 983 (1953); Dombrosvsky, V. A., ibid. 94, 1021 (1953); Oort, J. H. and Walraven, J. H., Bull. Astron. Soc. Neth. No. 462 (1956); Baldwin, J. E., Nature 174, 320 (1954); Unsöld, A., Phys. Rev. 82, 357 (1951); Ginzburg, V. L., Doklady Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 76, 377 (1951); Shklovsky, I. S., International Conference on Nuclear Astrophysics, Liège (1953); Vashakidae, M. A., Abastumani Astron. Circ. No. 147, 11 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Kahn, F. D., Bull. Astron. Soc. Neth. 12, 187 (1954).Google Scholar
40 Oort, J. H. and Spitzer, L., Jr., Astrophys. J. 121, 6 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41 Savedoff, M. P., Astrophys. J. 124, 533 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 Chandrasekhar, S., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 210, 18, 26 (1951).Google Scholar
43 Parker, E. N., Nature 170, 1030 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44 Chandrasekhar, S., Astrophys. J. 119, 7 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Parker, E. N., Phys. Rev. 96, 1686 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Osterbrock, D. E., Astrophys. J. 122, 235 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Parker, E. N., Astrophys. J. 117, 169 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48 Parker, E. N., Phys. Rev. 99, 241 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 Chandrasekhar, S. and Fermi, E., Astrophys. J. 118, 116 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50 Chandrasekhar, S. and Limber, N., Astrophys. J. 119, 110 (1954).Google Scholar
51 Parker, E. N., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 3, 51 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52 Ginzburg, V. L., Doklady Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 92, 727 (1953).Google Scholar
53 Ginzburg, V. L., Nuovo cimento Suppl. 3, 38 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 Hayakawa, S., Progr. Theoret. Phys. 15, 111 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Parker, E. N., Phys. Rev. 107, 830 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56 Burbidge, G. R., Phys. Rev. 101, 907 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar