Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:56:15.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Globular Cluster Systems of Elliptical Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Stephen E. Zepf
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
Keith M. Ashman
Affiliation:
Depts. of Physics, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045 and Baker University, Baldwin, KS 66006

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We review the observed properties of globular cluster systems and their implications for models of galaxy formation. Observations show that globular clusters form in gas-rich mergers, and that bimodal metallicity distributions are common in the globular cluster systems of ellipticals, with the metal-poor population more extended than the metal-rich one. These are three of the four predictions of the simple merger model of Ashman & Zepf (1992). The fourth prediction concerns the properties of the globular cluster systems of spirals, and is still to be tested by observation. Adopting Occam's razor, the confirmation of the fundamental predictions of the merger model from both young and old globular cluster systems is strong evidence that typical elliptical galaxies formed from the mergers of spiral galaxies. However, the simplifying assumptions of the Ashman-Zepf merger model limit its applicability to certain complex situations such as the formation of cD galaxies. We conclude this review by introducing new observational and theoretical programs that will further the understanding of the physical mechanisms of globular cluster and galaxy formation.

Type
Mergers & Remnants
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1999 

References

Ashman, K.M., & Zepf, S.E. 1992, ApJ, 384, 50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashman, K.M., & Zepf, S.E. 1998, Globular Cluster Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), in press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bica, E., & Alloin, D. 1986, A&A, 162, 21 Google Scholar
Cohen, J.G., & Ryzhov, A. 1997, ApJ, 486, 230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S., Aragon-Salamanca, A., Frenk, C.S., Navarro, J., & Zepf, S.E. 1994, MNRAS, 271, 781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D.A., Brodie, J.P., & Grillmair, C.J. 1997, AJ, 113, 1652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisler, D., Lee, M.G., & Kim, E. 1996, AJ, 111, 1529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedin, O.Y., & Ostriker, J.P. 1997, ApJ, 474, 223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, G., White, S.D.M., & Guiderdoni, B. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, L.C. & Filippenko, A.V. 1997, ApJ, 466, L83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, F. 1987, in Nearly Normal Galaxies, ed. Faber, S.M. (New York: Springer), 18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, F. 1997, in The Nature of Elliptical Galaxies, eds. Arnaboldi, M., Da Costa, G.S., & Saha, P. (San Francisco: ASP), 447 Google Scholar
Schweizer, F. & Seitzer, P., 1993, ApJ, 417, L29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpies, R.M., Zepf, S.E., Bridges, T.J., et al. 1997, MNRAS, submitted Google Scholar
Secker, J., Geisler, D., McLaughlin, D., & Harris, W.E. 1995, AJ, 109, 1019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, S. 1990, in Dynamics and Interactions of Galaxies, ed. Wielen, R. (Berlin: Springer), 492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, B.C. 1998, these proceedings CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, B.C., et al. 1995, ApJ, 454, L73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zepf, S.E., & Ashman, K.M. 1993 MNRAS, 264, 611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zepf, S.E., Carter, D., Sharpies, R.M. & Ashman, K.M. 1995a, ApJ, 445, L19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zepf, S.E., Ashman, K.M., & Geisler, D. 1995b, ApJ, 443, 570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar