Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-28T12:42:01.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

General Relativity confronts experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Clifford M. Will
Clifford M. Will*
Affiliation:
McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We review the status of experimental tests of general relativity. These include tests of the Einstein Equivalence Principle, which requires that gravitation be described by a curved-spacetime, “metric” theory of gravity. General relativity is consistent with all tests to date, including the “classical tests”: light deflection using radio interferometers, radar time delay using Viking Mars landers, and the perihelion shift of Mercury; and tests of the strong equivalence principle, such as lunar laser ranging tests of the “Nordtvedt effect”, and tests for variations in G. We also review ten years of observations of the Binary Pulsar, in which the first evidence for gravitational radiation has been found.

Type
High Precision Observations and Relativity
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 114: Relativity in Celestial Mechanics and Astrometry , 1986 , pp. 355 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Anderson, J. T., Cabrera, B., Everitt, C. W. F., Leslie, B. C., and Lipa, J. A. 1982, in Proc. Second Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, ed. Ruffini, R. (Amsterdam: North Holland), p. 939.Google Scholar
Hellings, R. W. 1984, in General Relativity and Gravitation, eds. Bertotti, B., de Felice, F., and Pascolini, A. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellings, R. W., Adams, P. J., Anderson, J. D., Keesey, M. S., Lau, E. L., Standish, E. M., Canuto, V. M., and Goldman, I. 1983, Phys. Rev. Letters 51, 1609.Google Scholar
Prestage, J. D., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., and Wineland, D. J. 1985, Phys. Rev. Letters. 54, 2387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reasenberg, R. D. 1984, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 310, 227.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. S., and Carter, W. E. 1984, Nature, 310, 572.Google Scholar
Vessot, R. F. C. 1984, Contemp. Phys., 25, 355.Google Scholar
Weisberg, J. M., and Taylor, J. H. 1984, Phys. Rev. Letters, 52, 1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, C. M. 1981, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), referred to as TEGP.Google Scholar
Will, C. M. 1984, Phys. Reports, 113, 345.Google Scholar
Will, C. M. 1985, in Inner Space/Outer Space: The Interface of Cosmology and Particle Physics, eds. Kolb, E. W., Turner, M. S., Olive, K., Seckel, D., and Lindley, D. (Chicago: University of Chicago).Google Scholar