Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:39:54.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gaseous Content of Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Morton S. Roberts
Morton S. Roberts*
Affiliation:
National Radio Astronomy Observatory∗, Green Bank, West Va., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A general review is given of the content and distribution of interstellar gas within galaxies. The constancy of the ratio N(He)/N(H), independent of galaxy type (spirals and irregulars), is discussed and the possible mechanisms for this constancy are considered. The helium abundance does not vary across the disk of spirals, although nitrogen and possibly other elements do.

The gross features of the neutral hydrogen distribution in our Galaxy and other systems are described. In spirals, the peak of the radial distribution of Hi is located well away from the optical center. This is not the case for irregular-type systems. A possible correlation of the relative location of the maxima of Hi and Hii distributions with galaxy type is described. Many spirals studied with high enough relative angular resolution show concentrations of Hi in their outermost regions. These may be due to hydrogen companions or warps in the hydrogen plane. Hydrogen ‘bridges’ are described and a new example for the triple system M81–M82–NGC 3077 is given. This latter case may be an extreme example of distortion by companion galaxies of the Hi associated with a massive galaxy.

The neutral hydrogen content of a galaxy and its correlation with other integral properties is discussed. The absorption profile due to hydrogen associated with the radio galaxy Centaurus A is given. Comparison of optical and 21-cm measurements of galaxian redshifts shows excellent agreement over the radical velocity range −400 to + 5200 km s−1. There is, however, a systematic difference between 21 cm and optical redshifts over the range ∼ 1200 to ∼ 2400 km s−1 for optical values based on blue-sensitive spectra. The difference, ∼ 100 km s−1, is most likely due to blending of galaxian and night sky H and K absorption lines. The Hubble Constant is derived from a redshift-21 cm flux relation. Values in the range 78 to 109 km s−1 Mpc−1 are derived. A value of 97 kms−1 Mpc−1 is favored.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 44: External Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects , 1972 , pp. 12 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1972 

References

Bottinelli, L., Chamaraux, P., Gouguenheim, L., and Lauqué, R.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 6, 453.Google Scholar
Bridle, A. and Venugopal, V.: 1969, Nature 224, 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbidge, E. M. and Burbidge, G. R.: 1962, Astrophys. J. 135, 694.Google Scholar
Burbidge, E. M. and Burbidge, G. R.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbidge, G. R., Gould, R. J., and Pottasch, S. R.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 138, 945.Google Scholar
Burke, B. F.: 1967, in van Woerden, H. (ed.), ‘Radio Astronomy and the Galactic System’, IAU Symp. 31, 185.Google Scholar
Burke, B. F., Turner, K. C., and Tuve, M. A.: 1963, in Annual Report of the Director, Dept. of Terrestrial Magnetism, 1962–63, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, D.C., p. 289.Google Scholar
Burns, R. and Roberts, M.: 1970, in preparation.Google Scholar
Carruthers, G. R.: 1970, Astrophys. J. Letters 161, L81.Google Scholar
Demoulin, M. T. H.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, 81.Google Scholar
Gordon, C.: 1970, Astron. J. 75, 914.Google Scholar
Gordon, K.: 1970, Astrophys. J. in press.Google Scholar
Heidmann, J.: 1961, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 15, 314.Google Scholar
Hindman, J. V., Kerr, F. J., and McGee, R. X.: 1963, Australian J. Phys. 16, 570.Google Scholar
Humason, M. L., Mayall, N. U., and Sandage, A. R.: 1956, Astron. J. 61, 97.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. M.: 1959, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 71, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, F. J. and Westerhout, G.: 1965, in Kuiper, G. P. and Middlehurst, B. M., (eds.), Galactic Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 167.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. M.: 1968, Proc. Astron. Soc. Australia 1, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. C.: 1970, Invited Discourse, 14th General Assembly IAU.Google Scholar
McGee, R. X.: 1964, Australian J. Phys. 17, 515.Google Scholar
McGee, R. X. and Milton, J. A.: 1966, Australian J. Phys. 19, 343.Google Scholar
Mathis, J. S.: 1965, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 77, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayall, N. U.: 1960, Ann. Astrophys. 23, 344.Google Scholar
Menon, T. K.: 1958, Astrophys. J. 127, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oort, J. H.: 1965, Trans. IAU, 12 A, 789, Figure 2.Google Scholar
Peimbert, M.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 33.Google Scholar
Peimbert, M. and Costero, R.: 1969, Bol. Obs. Tonantzintla Tacubaya 5, 3.Google Scholar
Peimbert, M. and Spinrad, H.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 809.Google Scholar
Reifenstein, E. C. III, Wilson, T. L., Burke, B. F., Mezger, P. G., and Altenhoff, W. J.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 4, 357.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. S.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 151, 117.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. S.: 1969, Astron. J. 74, 859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. S.: 1970, Astrophys. J. Letters 161, L9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. S. and Warren, J. L.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 6, 165.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. J. and Koehler, J. A.: 1965, Nature 208, 993.Google Scholar
Rubin, V. C., Ford, W. K. Jr., and D'Odorico, S.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 160, 801.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.: 1962, in Sahade, J., (ed.) ‘Symposium on Stellar Evolution’, Astronomical Observatory, La Plata, Argentina, p. 61.Google Scholar
Searle, L.: 1971, this volume, p. 66.Google Scholar
Shobbrook, R. R. and Robinson, B. J.: 1967, Australian J. Phys. 20, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, K. C.: 1970, in Annual Report of the Director, Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, 1968–69, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, D.C., p. 366.Google Scholar
Van de Hulst, H. C., Raimond, E., and Van Woerden, H.: 1957, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 14, 1.Google Scholar
Vaucouleurs, G. de: 1966, in Barbera, G. (ed.) ‘Galileo Symp. Cosmology’, Florence, Italy, p. 37.Google Scholar
Volders, L. and Högbom, J. A.: 1961, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 15, 307.Google Scholar
Weliachew, L.: 1969, Astron. Astrophys. 3, 402.Google Scholar