Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:46:44.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Galactic Population and Birth Rate of Radio Pulsars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

D. R. Lorimer
D. R. Lorimer*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Observatory, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We review current understanding of the underlying, as opposed to the observed, pulsar population. The observed sample is heavily biased by selection effects, so that surveys see less than 10% of all potentially observable pulsars. We compare various techniques used to correct the sample for these biases. By far the most significant recent development has been the discovery of over 700 pulsars in the Parkes Multibeam (PM) survey. This new sample is far less affected by selection effects and we use it to make a preliminary analysis of the Galactic pulsar distribution, finding further evidence for a deficit of pulsars in the inner Galaxy.

Type
Part 3: Pulsars: Surveys and Galactic Distribution
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 218: Young Neutrons Stars and their Environments , 2004 , pp. 105 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Backer, D. C., 1970, Nature, 228, 42.Google Scholar
Bailes, M., & Kniffen, D. A. 1992, ApJ, 391, 659.Google Scholar
Bailes, M. 1989, ApJ, 342, 917.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, D. et al. 1992, A&A, 254, 198.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. D. 1990, MNRAS, 245, 514.Google Scholar
Blaauw, A., 1961, Bull. Astr. Inst. Netherlands, 15, 265.Google Scholar
Clifton, T. R. et al. 1992, MNRAS, 254, 177.Google Scholar
Damashek, M., Taylor, J. H., & Hulse, R. A. 1978, ApJ, 225, L31.Google Scholar
Davies, J. G., Lyne, A. G., & Seiradakis, J. H. 1977, MNRAS, 179, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, J. E., & Ostriker, J. P. 1970, ApJ, 160, 979 (GO).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, S. 1994, MNRAS, 268, 595.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. et al. 1992, MNRAS, 255, 401.Google Scholar
Large, M. I. 1971, in IAU Symposium No. 46 (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 165.Google Scholar
Lorimer, D. R. et al. 1993, MNRAS, 263, 403.Google Scholar
Lyne, A. G., & Manchester, R. N. 1988, MNRAS, 234, 477.Google Scholar
Lyne, A. G., Manchester, R. N., & Taylor, J. H. 1985, MNRAS, 213, 613 (LMT).Google Scholar
Narayan, R. & Ostriker, J. P. 1990, ApJ, 352, 222.Google Scholar
Narayan, R., & Vivekanand, M. 1983, A&A, 122, 45.Google Scholar
Narayan, R. 1987, ApJ, 319, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nice, D. J. 1999, ApJ, 513, 927.Google Scholar
Phinney, E. S., & Blandford, R. D. 1981, MNRAS, 194, 137.Google Scholar
Rickett, B. J. 1970, MNRAS, 150, 67.Google Scholar
Ritchings, R. T. 1976, MNRAS, 176, 249.Google Scholar
Sayer, R. W., Nice, D. J., & Taylor, J. H. 1997, ApJ, 474, 426.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1968, ApJ, 151, 393.Google Scholar
Tauris, T. M., & Manchester, R. N. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 625.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. H., & Manchester, R. N. 1977, ApJ, 215, 885 (TM).Google Scholar
Vivekanand, M., & Narayan, R. 1981, JA&A, 2, 315 (VN).Google Scholar