Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:30:19.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Faint Surface Photometry of the Halo of M31

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Chris Pritchet
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3P6
Sidney van den Bergh
Affiliation:
Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, 5071 W. Saanich Road, Victoria, BC, Canada V8X 4M6

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have obtained counts of stars near the tip of the red giant branch of M31, and have used these counts to estimate the surface brightness of the halo of M31 down to a level of μV ∼ 30 mag arcsec–2 (R ∼ 20 kpc). The surface brightness along the minor axis of the M31 halo is well-represented by a single de Vaucouleurs law (0.2 ≃ R[kpc] ≃ 20). Alternatively, the outer halo of M31 can also be modelled by a power-law density distribution of the form ρ(R) ∞ R –5. This result suggests that the globular cluster component of the halo of M31 (for which ρ ∞ R –3) is more extended than the stellar halo of this galaxy. At μv à 28 mag arcsec–2 (R à 10 kpc), the axial ratio of the halo of M31 is found to be c/a = 0.55 ± 0.05.

Type
Chapter 1: Are the Disk and Halo Axisymmetric?
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1996 

References

Christian, C.A., & Heasley, J.N.; 1991, AJ, 101, 848.Google Scholar
Forte, J.C., Strom, S.E., & Strom, K.M.; 1981, ApJL, 245, L9.Google Scholar
Fusi Pecci, F., Cacciari, C., Frederici, L., & Pasquali, A.; 1993, in The Globular Cluster Connection , ed. Smith, G.H. and Brodie, J.P., A.S.P. Conference Series (San Francisco: ASP), p. 410.Google Scholar
Harris, W.E.; 1991, ARA&A, 29, 543.Google Scholar
Harris, W.E., & Racine, R.; 1979, ARA&A, 17, 241.Google Scholar
Kent, S.M.; 1983, ApJ, 266, 562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kron, R.G.; 1980, ApJS, 43, 305.Google Scholar
Light, E.S., Danielson, R.E., & Schwarzschild, M.; 1974, ApJ, 194, 257.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, D.E., Harris, W.E., & Hanes, D.A.; 1993, ApJ, in press.Google Scholar
Mould, J., & Kristian, J.; 1986, ApJ, 305, 591.Google Scholar
Pritchet, C.J. & van den Bergh, S.; 1988, ApJ, 331, 135.Google Scholar
Pritchet, C.J. & van den Bergh, S.; 1994, AJ, 107, 1730 (PV94).Google Scholar
Racine, R.; 1991, AJ, 101, 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racine, R., & Harris, W.E.; 1989, AJ, 98, 1609.Google Scholar
Stetson, P.B.; 1987, PASP, 99, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, S., & Pritchet, C.J.; 1992, in The Stellar Populations of Galaxies , ed. Barbuy, B. & Renzini, A. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 161.Google Scholar
van der Kruit, P.C., & Searle, L.; 1981a, A&A, 95, 105.Google Scholar
van der Kruit, P.C., & Searle, L.; 1981 6, A&A , 95, 116.Google Scholar
van der Kruit, P.C., & Searle, L.; 1982, A&A, 110, 79.Google Scholar
Vaucouleurs, G. de; 1958, ApJ, 128, 465.Google Scholar
Vaucouleurs, G. de, & Pence, W.D. 1978, AJ, 83, 1163 Google Scholar
Walterbos, R.A.M., & Kennicutt, R.C.; 1987, A&ASuppl, 69, 311.Google Scholar
Walterbos, R.A.M., & Kennicutt, R.C.; 1988, A&A, 198, 61 (WK88).Google Scholar
Walterbos, R.A.M., & Schwering, P.B.W.; 1987, A&A, 180, 27.Google Scholar
Wyse, R.F.G., & Gilmore, G.; 1989, Comm. Ap., 13, 135.Google Scholar