Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T16:23:28.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of refraction by geodetic measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Ludvík Hradilek*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The merits of two refraction methods are discussed with the result that the line refraction method is appropriate for elaboration of trigonometric leveling traverses whereas the station refraction method is comparatively more convenient for trigonometric and three-dimensional networks of a larger extent especially those designed in high mountain regions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Blažek, R. and Hradilek, L.: 1978, Proceedings IAU Symp. 89, Uppsala.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, K.: 1974, Oest. Zeitschr. f. Verm. und Photogr. 62, pp. 4960.Google Scholar
Hradilek, L.: 1972, Canadian Surveyor 26, pp. 5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hradilek, L.: 1973, Zeitschr. f. Verm. 98, pp. 243252.Google Scholar
Hradilek, L.: 1977, Zeitschr. f. Verm. 102, pp. 5763.Google Scholar
Ramsayer, K.: 1974, Proceedings IAG Symp. Stockholm, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Ramsayer, K.: 1978, Proceedings IAU Symp. No 89, Uppsala.Google Scholar