Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T07:41:55.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of Random Changes in the Earth's Rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

B. D. Tapley
Affiliation:
Dept. of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
B. E. Schutz
Affiliation:
Dept. of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The usual procedures for estimating the motion of the Earth's pole use a least squares data reduction procedure to estimate the coefficients in a time series solution for the coordinates of the pole. Whether optical data or radar tracking data from near Earth satellites is used, the presence of random accelerations in the equations which describe the motion of the Earth's pole will lead to errors if the data is reduced in the classical least squares manner. This investigation presents a technique for estimating the polar motion in the presence of unmodeled accelerations. The unmodeled acceleration is represented by a first order stationary Gauss-Markoff process which can be separated into a timewise correlated component and a purely random component. Using this model, a sequential estimation procedure is developed for estimating the orientation of the pole, the components of Earth's angular velocity and the magnitude of the components of the unmodeled acceleration. The application of the method using both optical and radar tracking data from near Earth satellites is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1972 

References

Andele, R. J. and Beuglass, L. K.: 1970, ‘Polar Motion for 1967 and 1968 Derived from Doppler Satellite Observations’, 51st Annual Meeting of the AGU, Washington, D.C., April 20, 1970.Google Scholar
Guinot, B.: 1970 in Mansinha, L. et al. (eds.), Earthquake Displacement Fields and the Rotation of the Earth, D. Reidel Publ. Comp., Dordrecht-Holland, pp. 5462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. S. and Tapley, B. D.: 1971, ‘Lunar Orbit Determination in the Presence of Unmodeled Accelerations’, AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Paper No. 71-371, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, August 1971.Google Scholar
Liebelt, P. G.: 1967, An Introduction to Optimal Estimation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, p. 30.Google Scholar
Squires, R. K., Woolston, D. S., and Wolf, H.: 1969, ‘Response of Orbit Determination Systems to Model Errors’, Goddard Space Flight Center, Preprint X-643-69-503, November 1969.Google Scholar
Tapley, B. D. and Ingram, D. S.: 1970, ‘Estimating Unmodeled Acceleration During Orbit Determination’, First Annual Meeting of the AAS Division of Dynamical Astronomy, Austin, Texas, January 1970.Google Scholar
Tapley, B. D. and Ingram, D. S.: 1971, ‘Orbit Determination in the Presence of Unmodeled Accelerations’, Proceedings of the IEEE-AFOSR Second Symposium on Nonlinear Estimation Theory, San Diego, California, September 1971.Google Scholar
Yumi, S.: 1970, in Mansinha, L. et al. (eds.), Earthquake Displacement Fields and the Rotation of the Earth, D. Reidel Publ. Comp., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 4653.Google Scholar