Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:43:06.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy Density of the Relic Radiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

A. G. Blair
A. G. Blair*
Affiliation:
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, University of California, Los Alamos, N.M., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Experimental measurements of the intensity of the submillimeter background are reviewed. The latest results all indicate a low background; it is not yet possible to say whether or not the spectrum in this range is blackbody.

Type
Part III: Relic Radiation
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 63: Confrontation of Cosmological Theories , 1974 , pp. 143 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Apparao, , Krishna, M. V.: 1968, Nature 219, 709.Google Scholar
Beckman, J. E., Ade, P. A. R., Huizinga, J. S., Robson, E. I., Vickers, D. G., and Harries, J. E.: 1972, Nature 237, 154.Google Scholar
Bortolot, V. J. Jr., Clauser, J. F., and Thaddeus, P.: 1969, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 307.Google Scholar
Boyton, P. E., Stokes, R. A., and Wilkinson, D. T.: 1968, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 462.Google Scholar
Caroff, L. J. and Petrosian, V.: 1971, Nature 231, 378.Google Scholar
Cowsik, R. and Price, P. B.: 1971, Phys. Today 24, 30.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H., Peebles, P. J. E., Roll, P. G., and Wilkinson, D. T.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 414.Google Scholar
Harwit, M., Houck, J. R., and Fuhrmann, K.: 1969, Appl. Opt. 8, 473.Google Scholar
Harwit, M., Houck, J. R., and Wagoner, R. V.: 1970, Nature 228, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwit, M., McNutt, D. P., Shivanandan, K., and Zajac, B. J.: 1966, Astron. J. 71, 1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houck, J. R. and Harwit, M.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, L45.Google Scholar
Houck, J. R., Soifer, B. T., Harwit, M., and Pipher, J. L.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 178, L29.Google Scholar
Millea, M. F., McColl, M., Pedersen, R. J., and Vernon, F. L. Jr.: 1971, Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 919.Google Scholar
Muehlner, D. and Weiss, R.: 1970, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 742.Google Scholar
Muehlner, D. and Weiss, R.: 1973a, Phys. Rev. D7, 326.Google Scholar
Muehlner, D. and Weiss, R.: 1973b, Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolt, I. G., Radostitz, J. V., and Donnelly, R. J.: 1972, Nature 236, 444.Google Scholar
Penzias, A. A. and Wilson, R. W.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 419.Google Scholar
Shivanandan, K., Houck, J. R., and Harwit, M. O.: 1968, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 1460.Google Scholar
Thaddeus, P.: 1972, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 305 (see for a recent review of these results).Google Scholar
Williamson, K. D., Blair, A. G., Catlin, L. L., Hiebert, R. D., Loyd, E. G., and Romero, H. V.: 1973, Nature 241, 79.Google Scholar