Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:36:53.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of Superclusters as the Most Powerful Test for Theories of Galaxy Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

L. M. Ozernoy*
Affiliation:
Theoretical Department, P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Academy of Sciences of U.S.S.R., Moscow, U.S.S.R.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Analysis of Brown's (1964, 1968) data on the orientation of galaxies inside superclusters confirms his conclusion that the directions of the major axes of the galaxies are significantly correlated. For a number of superclusters, the minor axes are found to be oriented along the direction of the flattening of the supercluster as a whole. By analogy with the Local Supercluster where the same phenomenon is associated presumably with the rotation established by de Vaucouleurs (1959), one may conclude that, in general, superclusters rotate. It is shown that rotation on scales as large as these cannot be explained by tidal or by any local effects, and must have a primeval nature analogous to the 3 K microwave background. Rotation on such scales contradicts the standard idea of galaxy formation from density fluctuations but favours the concept of primeval whirls which gave rise to pregalactic density inhomogeneities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Bogart, R. S. and Wagoner, R. V.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 181, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozhich, S. P. and Ozernoy, L. M.: 1974, to be published.Google Scholar
Brecher, K.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 23, 105.Google Scholar
Brown, F. G.: 1964, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 127, 517.Google Scholar
Brown, F. G.: 1968, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 138, 527.Google Scholar
Chibishov, G. V.: 1972, Astron. Zh. 49, 74.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G.: 1959, Astron. Zh. 36, 977.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G.: 1972, in Evans, D. S. (ed.), ‘External Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects’, IAU Symp. 44, 353.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G. and Peters, W. L.: 1968, Nature 220, 868.Google Scholar
Doroshkevich, A. G.: 1972, Astron. Zh. 49, 1221 (see also Astrophys. Letters 14, 11, 1973).Google Scholar
Gorbachev, B. I.: 1969, Astron. Tsirk. U.S.S.R. No. 495, 7.Google Scholar
Kalinkov, M.: 1968a, Dokl. Bolgar. Akad. Nauk 21, 621.Google Scholar
Kalinkov, M.: 1968b, Astron. Tsirk. U.S.S.R. No. 475, 4.Google Scholar
Kalinkov, M.: 1971, Bolgar. Akad. Nauk. Bull. Sec. Astron. 4, 123.Google Scholar
Karachentzev, I. D.: 1964, Izv. Akad. Nauk Arm. S.S.R., ser. fiz.-matem. 17, 109.Google Scholar
Kostjuk, I. P.: 1971, Problems of Cosmical Physics, 6, 205 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Ozernoy, L. M.: 1971, Astron. Zh. 48, 1160.Google Scholar
Ozernoy, L. M.: 1973, in Longair, M. S. (ed.), ‘Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data’, IAU Symp. 63 (in press); Preprint No. 159 Lebedev Physical Institute.Google Scholar
Ozernoy, L. M. and Chibisov, G. V.: 1970, Astron. Zh. 47, 769.Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 11, 377.Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. and Yu, J. T.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 162, 815.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, M.: 1972, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 156, 151.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, M. and Roberts, M. S.: 1972, Astrophys. Letters 12, 201.Google Scholar
Sastry, G. N.: 1968, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 80, 252 Google Scholar
Thiel, M. A. F.: 1972, Astrophys. Space Sci. 17, 39.Google Scholar
van Albada, G. B.: 1962, in McVittie, G. C. (ed.), Problems of Extragalactic Research, Macmillan, New York, p. 411.Google Scholar
von Weizsäcker, C. F.: 1951, Astrophys. J. 114, 165.Google Scholar
Webster, A. S.: 1972, Nature 238, 20.Google Scholar
Willson, M. A. G.: 1972, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 155, 275.Google Scholar
Zel'dovich, Ya. B.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 5, 84; Astrofizika 6, 319.Google Scholar