Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T12:34:35.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Difference Between Dynamic and Stellar Reference Frames: Results Based on Astrometric Observations of Martian Satellites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

N.V. Emelyanov ,
Yu.F. Kolyuka ,
S.M. Kudryavtsev ,
K.V. Kuimov ,
V.F. Tikhonov  and
V.V. Chazov
N.V. Emelyanov
Affiliation:
1Sternberg State Astronomical Institute Universitskii Prosp. 13 119899 Moscow, USSR
Yu.F. Kolyuka
Affiliation:
2Mission Control Centre Kaliningrad Moscow Region, USSR
S.M. Kudryavtsev
Affiliation:
2Mission Control Centre Kaliningrad Moscow Region, USSR
K.V. Kuimov
Affiliation:
1Sternberg State Astronomical Institute Universitskii Prosp. 13 119899 Moscow, USSR
V.F. Tikhonov
Affiliation:
2Mission Control Centre Kaliningrad Moscow Region, USSR
V.V. Chazov
Affiliation:
1Sternberg State Astronomical Institute Universitskii Prosp. 13 119899 Moscow, USSR

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The possibility of using precise astrometric observations of Martian satellites in 1988 for improving the mutual orientation of the dynamic and stellar reference frames is discussed. The results obtained lead to the conclusion that the stellar reference frame is rotated about the X axis of the dynamic one. However, the value of this rotation (∼2.″5) proves to be unrealistically large and repetitions of precise observations of Martian satellites are needed in the future for verifying this result.

Type
Part 3: Concepts, Definitions, Models
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 141: Inertial Coordinate System on the Sky , 1990 , pp. 191 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1990 

References

1. Bugaenko, O.I., Evstigneeva, N.M., Kudryavtsev, S.M. et al. (1990) Astron. Asrophys. (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
2. Kudryavtsev, S.M., Kolyuka, Yu.F., Tikhonov, V.F. (1989) SAI preprint 2, 19–25.Google Scholar
3. Akim, E.L., Brumberg, V.A., Kislik, M.D. et al. (1986) in Kovalevsky, J. and Brumberg, V.A. (eds.), Relativity in Celestial Mechanics and Astrometry , (proceedings of 114th symposium of IAU), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Emelyanov, N.V., Nasonova, L.P. (1989) Sov. Astron. J. , 66, 850–858.Google Scholar