Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:38:56.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of Planetary Masses from the Motions of Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

W. J. Klepczynski
W. J. Klepczynski*
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A brief survey is given of past determinations of the masses of the principal planets from analyses of the motions of comets. Some numerical experiments using comets which have close approaches to Jupiter are made. As a result of these experiments, it is concluded that the conventional least squares solution for the correction to the mass of Jupiter is inadequate for comets which have a close approach to Jupiter. It is further concluded that perhaps, in some cases, the apparent presence of nongravitational forces is merely a manifestation of the failure of the conventional orbit correction process to adjust correctly the orbits of objects which undergo very large perturbations, and it also may be a consequence of errors in the adopted planetary masses. It is suggested that the use of partial derivatives obtained through the numerical integration of the variational equations may overcome the difficulties.

Type
Part III/Motions of the Short-Period Comets
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 45: The Motion, Evolution of Orbits and Origin of Comets , 1972 , pp. 209 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1972 

References

Backlund, O.: 1894, Bull. Astron. 11, 473.Google Scholar
Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G. M.: 1961, Methods of Celestial Mechanics , Academic Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Eckert, W. J. and Brouwer, D.: 1937, Astron. J. 46, 125.Google Scholar
Haerdtl, E.: 1889a, Denk. Acad. Wiss. Wien Math.-Nat. Kl. 56, 151.Google Scholar
Haerdtl, E.: 1889b, Astron. Nachr. 120, 257.Google Scholar
Herget, P.: 1970, private communication.Google Scholar
Makover, S. G.: 1956, Byull. Inst. Teor. Astron. 6, 67.Google Scholar
Makover, S. G. and Bokhan, N. A.: 1961, Trudy Inst. Teor. Astron. 8, 135.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G.: 1968, Astron. J. 73, 367.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G.: 1969, Astron. J. 74, 720.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G.: 1970, Astron. J. 75, 75.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G.: 1972, this Symposium, p. 239.Google Scholar
Möller, A.: 1872, Viertelj. Astron. Ges. 7, 85.Google Scholar
Porter, J. G.: 1961, Mem. Br. Astron. Assoc. 39, No. 3.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, H. Q.: 1967, Publ. Mind. Medd. Kbh. Obs . No. 194.Google Scholar
Roemer, E.: 1961, Astron. J. 66, 368.Google Scholar
Schubart, J. and Stumpff, P.: 1966, Veroeffentl. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Heidelberg No. 18.Google Scholar