Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:42:51.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical rates of stellar mass loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

D. S. P. Dearborn
Affiliation:
University of Arizona and The Aerospace Corporation
J. B. Blake
Affiliation:
University of Arizona and The Aerospace Corporation

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many of the effects of mass loss on OB stars have now been explored. Mass loss will cause a star to be overluminous for its mass (though less luminous than a star of its original mass) and, for moderate mass-loss rates, the luminosity decreases at the same rate as the mass contained in the convective core decreases causing the main sequence lifetime to remain unchanged (Chiosi and Nasi 1974, 1978, Deloore, DeGreve and Lamers 1977, Dearborn, Blake, Hainebach and Schramm 1978). Mass loss can also expose layers where 14N has been enhanced via the CNO tricyle (Dearborn and Eggleton 1977) and, in extreme cases, can produce a stripped helium core resembling a Wolf-Rayet Star (Hartwick 1967). While many of these phenomena (in particular the composition change) are more sensitive to the total mass removed than the formalism used to represent the mass loss, significant differences will result for the same average mass-loss rate depending on whether the mass was removed early (near the ZAMS), or late (near core hydrogen depletion). In addition, there appears to be a critical mass loss rate which depends on initial mass and separates those models which continue to evolve in a relatively normal (though subluminous) manner, and those models which evolve to a Wolf-Rayet configuration.

Type
Session 6: Evolution with Mass Loss: Single Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Arnett, W. D.: 1973, Explosive Nucleosynthesis, ed. Schramm, and Arnett, , Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Chevalier, R.: 1976, Ap. J. 208, 826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiosi, C. and Nassi, E.: 1974, Astr. and Ap. 34, 355; 1978; Astr. and Ap., 63, 103.Google Scholar
Conti, P.: 1978, preprint.Google Scholar
Dearborn, D. and Eggleton, P.: 1977, Ap. J. 213, 448.Google Scholar
Dearborn, D., Blake, B., Hainebach, K. and Schramm, D.: 1978, Ap. J. July 15th, in press.Google Scholar
Dearborn, D., Tinsley, B., and Schramm, D.: 1978, in press.Google Scholar
DeLoore, C., DeGreve, J., and Lamers, H.: 1977, Astr. and Ap., 61, 251.Google Scholar
Hartwick, F.: 1967, Ap. J., 150, 953.Google Scholar
Lamb, S.: 1978, Ap. J., 220, 186.Google Scholar
McCrae, , 1962, Quart. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 3, 63.Google Scholar
Truran, J.: 1976, CNO Isotopes in Astrophysics, ed. Audouze, J., D. Reidel Publishing Co. Dordrecht.Google Scholar