Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T02:51:38.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confrontation of Antimatter Cosmologies with Observational Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

Gary Steigman*
Affiliation:
Yale University U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The presence of large amounts of antimatter in the Universe would be detectable directly via the cosmic rays and indirectly via the annihilation γ-rays. The observational data is reviewed. There is no evidence whatever indicating the presence of astrophysically interesting amounts of antimatter in the Universe. From the available data we may conclude that the Galaxy is made entirely of ordinary matter and that if any antimatter at all is present in the Universe, it must be very well separated from ordinary matter. Furthermore, we show that the observational constraints on various symmetrical cosmological models strengthen the case against antimatter in the Universe.

Type
Part VI: Matter-Antimatter Universes and Physical Processes Near the Singularity
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

[1] Steigman, G.: 1973, in Schatzman, E. (ed.), Cargèse Lectures in Physics 6, Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
[2] Steigman, G. and Strittmatter, P. A.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 11, 279.Google Scholar
[3] Steigman, G.: 1973, Proceedings of the International Symposium and Workshop on Gamma Ray Astrophysics.Google Scholar
[4] Apparao, M. V. K.: 1967, Nature 215, 727.Google Scholar
[5] Aizu, H., Fugimoto, Y., Hasegawa, S., Koshiba, H., Mito, I., Nishimura, J., Yokio, K., and Schein, M.: 1961, Phys. Rev. 121, 1206.Google Scholar
[6] Bogmolov, E. A., Lubyanaya, N. D., Romanov, V. A.: 1971, Hobart Conference Papers 5, 1730.Google Scholar
[7] Brooke, G. and Wolfendale, A. W.: 1964, Nature 202, 480.Google Scholar
[8] Evenson, P.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 176, 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Ivanova, N. S., Gagarin, Yu. F., and Kulikov, V. N.: 1968, Cosmic Research 6, 69.Google Scholar
[10] Verma, R. P., Rengaragan, T. N., Tandon, S. N., Damle, S. V., and Pal, Y.: 1972, Nature 240, 135.Google Scholar
[11] Grigorov, N. L., Zhuravlev, D. A., Kondrateva, M. A., Rapoport, I. D., and Savenko, I. A.: 1964, JETP 18, 272.Google Scholar
[12] Golden, R. L., Adams, J. H., Boykin, W. R., Deney, C. L., Marar, T. M. K., Heckman, H. H., and Lindstrom, P. L.: 1971, Hobart Conference Papers 1, 203.Google Scholar
[13] Buffington, A., Smith, L. H., Smoot, G. F., Alvarez, L. W., and Wahlig, M. A.: 1972, Nature 236, 335.Google Scholar
[14] Greenhill, J. G., Clarke, A. R., and Elliot, H.: 1971, Nature 230, 170.Google Scholar
[15] Gaisser, T. K. and Maurer, R. H.: 1973, Preprint.Google Scholar
[16] Brecher, K. and Burbidge, G. R.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 174, 253.Google Scholar
[17] Kraushaar, W. L., Clark, G. W., Garmire, G. P., Borken, R., Higbie, P., Leong, V., and Thorsos, T.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 177, 341.Google Scholar
[18] Field, G. B.: 1972, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 227.Google Scholar
[19] Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., Murray, S., Leong, C., Tananbaum, H., and Giacconi, R.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 167, L81.Google Scholar
[20] Steigman, G.: 1972, Some Critical Remarks on the Omnes Model, Preprint.Google Scholar
[21] Omnès, R.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 10, 228.Google Scholar
[22] Omnès, R.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 11, 450.Google Scholar
[23] Omnès, R.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 15, 275.Google Scholar
[24] Hoyle, F.: 1948, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 108, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Hoyle, F.: 1969, Nature 224, 477.Google Scholar
[26] Alfvén, H. and Klein, O.: 1962, Arkiv Fisik, 23, 187.Google Scholar
[27] Alfvén, H.: 1965, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 652.Google Scholar
[28] Laurent, B. L. and Söderholm, L.: 1969, Astron. Astrophys. 3, 197.Google Scholar