Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T04:33:25.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative CMBology: Putting Things Together

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Charles H. Lineweaver
Charles H. Lineweaver*
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia email: [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I present a series of diagrams which illustrate why the cosmic microwave background (CMB) data favor certain values for the cosmological parameters. Various methods to extract these parameters from CMB and non-CMB observations are forming an ever-tightening network of interlocking constraints. I review the increasingly precise constraints in the Ωm - ΩΛ plane and show why more cosmologists now prefer ΛCDM cosmologies to any other leading model.

Type
Part IX: Putting it all together
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 201: New Cosmological Data and the Values of the Fundamental Parameters , 2005 , pp. 358 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2005 

References

Binney, J., Dehnen, W. & Bertelli, G. MNRAS, submitted, 2001, astro-ph/0003479.Google Scholar
Bond, J. R. et al. 2001, these proceedings, astro-ph/0011378.Google Scholar
Bridle, S. L., Zehavi, I., Dekel, A, Lahav, O., Hobson, M. P. & Lasenby, A. N. 2000, MNRAS astro-ph/0006170.Google Scholar
Carretta, , et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. M. 2001, Living Reviews of Relativity, submitted, Fig. 11, astro-ph/0004075.Google Scholar
Cohn, J. D. 1998, Astrophys. Sp. Sci 259, 213, astro-ph/9807128.Google Scholar
Efstathiou, G., Bridle, S. R., Lasenby, A. N., Hobson, M. P. & Ellis, R. S. 1999, MNRAS, 303, L47–L52.Google Scholar
Freedman, W. et al. 2001, in preparation (these proceedings?;).Google Scholar
Helbig, P. 2001, these proceedings, astro-ph/0011031.Google Scholar
Hu, W. 1995, PhD thesis, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hu, W. & Sugiyama, N. 1995, ApJ, 444, 489.Google Scholar
Hu, W., Fukugita, M. & Tegmark, M. 2001, ApJ, submitted.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. et al. 2000, PRL, in press, astro-ph/0007333.Google Scholar
Kaplinghat, M. & Turner, M. S. submitted, astro-ph/0007452.Google Scholar
Kochanek, C. 1996, ApJ, 466, 638.Google Scholar
Lineweaver, C. H. et al. 1997, A&A, 322, 365, Section 3.2.1.Google Scholar
Lineweaver, C. H. & Barbosa, D. 1998, ApJ, 496, 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lineweaver, C. H. 1998, ApJ, 505, L69.Google Scholar
Lineweaver, C. H. 1999, Science, 284, 1503–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mould, J. et al. 1999, astro-ph/9909260.Google Scholar
Navarro, J. F. & Steinmetz, M. 2001, ApJ, submitted, astro-ph/0001003.Google Scholar
Olive, K. A., Steigman, G. & Walker, T.P. 1999, astro-ph/9905320.Google Scholar
Parodi, B. R., Saha, A., Sandage, A. & Tammann, G. A. 2000, ApJ, submitted, astro-ph/0004063.Google Scholar
Sahni, V. & Starobinsky, A. 1999, astro-ph/9904398.Google Scholar
Tegmark, M. 1996, in Proc. Enrico Fermi, Course CXXXII, Varenna, 1995.Google Scholar
Tegmark, M., Zaldarriaga, M. & Hamilton, A.J.S. 2001, Phys. Rev. D., astro-ph/0008167 v3.Google Scholar
Tytler, D. et al. 2001, Physica Scripta, in press astro-ph/0001318.Google Scholar