Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:39:57.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Supernova Remnants and Ancient Novae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

R. Minkowski
R. Minkowski*
Affiliation:
Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The low expansion velocity of the Crab Nebula proves conclusively that the supernova of + 1054 was not type I. Only five supernova remnants found in radio surveys are connected with ancient novae, +185, +1006, +1054, +1572, +1604. This corresponds to reasonable expectation. Most of the objects in historical records were comets, the remainder mostly ordinary novae. Most radio remnants are too old, some too heavily obscured to be found in historical records.

Type
Session 4
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 46: The Crab Nebula , 1971 , pp. 241 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971 

References

Chu, Sun-Il: 1968, J. Korean. Astron. Soc. 1, 29.Google Scholar
Duyvendak, J. J. L.: 1942, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 54, 91.Google Scholar
Gardner, F. F. and Milne, D. K.: 1965, Astron. J. 70, 754.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. R.: 1965, Astron. J. 70, 105.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. R. and Peng-Yoke, Ho: 1965, Astron. J. 70, 748.Google Scholar
Peng-Yoke, Ho: 1962, in Vistas in Astronomy 5 (ed. by Beer, A.), Pergamon Press, London, Oxford, New York, Paris p. 127.Google Scholar
Tsê-Tsung, Hsi: 1955, Acta Astron. Sin. 3, 183 (1958, Smithsonian Contr. Astrophys., 2, 109).Google Scholar
Katgert, P. and Oort, J. H.: 1967, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 19, 239.Google Scholar
Lozinskaya, T. A.: 1968, Astron. Zh. , 46, 245 (Soviet Astron. 13, 192).Google Scholar
Mackay, C. D.: 1970, Astrophys. Letters 5, 132.Google Scholar
Mayall, N. U. and Oort, J. H.: 1942, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 54, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, D. K.: 1970, Australian J. Phys. 23, 425.Google Scholar
Minkowski, R.: 1966, Astron. J. 71, 371.Google Scholar
Minkowski, R.: 1968, in Nebulae and Interstellar Matter (ed. by Middlehurst, B. M. and Aller, L. H.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, p. 623.Google Scholar
Minkowski, R.: 1970, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 82, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, J.: 1959, Science and Civilisation in China , Vol. 3, The University Press, Cambridge, Section 20, f.1.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 1.Google Scholar
Sedov, L. I.: 1959, Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics (transl. by Friedman, M.), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, I. S.: 1962, Astron. Zh. 39, 206. (Soviet Astron. 6, 162).Google Scholar
Tammann, G. A.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 8, 458.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I.: 1950, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A101, 159.Google Scholar
Trimble, V.: 1968, Astron. J. 73, 535.Google Scholar
Weiler, K. W. and Seielstad, G. A.: 1970, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 2, 224; 1971, Astrophys. J. 163, 455.Google Scholar
Woltjer, L.: 1970, in ‘Crab Nebula Symposium, June 18–21, 1969’, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 82, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ze-Zong, Xi and Shu-ren, Bo: 1965, Acta Astron. Sinica 13, 1 (NASA Tech. Trans. TT F-388).Google Scholar