Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:46:34.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anisotropy of the Microwave Background and Biased Galaxy Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Nick Kaiser
Nick Kaiser*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, England

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fluctuations in the microwave background will have been imprinted at z ≃ 1000, when the photons and the plasma decoupled. On angular scales greater than a few degrees these fluctuations provide a clear view of any primordial density perturbations, and therefore a clean test of theories which invoke such fluctuations from which to form the structure we see in the universe. On smaller angular scales the predictions are less certain: reionization of the gas may modify the spectrum of the primordial fluctuations, and secondary fluctuations may be generated.

Here I shall review some recent theoretical developments. A brief survey is made of the currently popular theories for the primordial perturbations, with emphasis on the predictions for large scale anisotropy. One major uncetainty in the predictions arises from the normalisation of the fluctuations to e.g. galaxy clustering, and much attention is given to the question of ‘biased’ galaxy formation. The effect of reionization on the primordial fluctuations is discussed, as is the anisotropy generated from scattering off hot gas in clusters, groups and galaxies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 130: Large Scale Structures of the Universe , 1988 , pp. 43 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

Bardeen, J.M., Bond, J.R., Kaiser, N. and Szalay, A., 1986. Ap.J., 304, 15.Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, M. and Gull, S.F. 1984. Nature, 309, 34.Google Scholar
Bond, J.R. and Efstathiou, G.P., 1984. Ap.J., 285, L45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S. and Kaiser, N., 1987. In preparation. Google Scholar
Efstathiou, G.P. and Bond, J.R., 1986. M.N.R.A.S., 218, 103.Google Scholar
Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.M., Davis, M. and Efstathiou, G.P., 1987. Preprint. Google Scholar
Fomalont, E.B., Kellermann, K.I., Weistrop, D., and Wall, J.V. 1986. Highlights of Astronomy, 7, 367.Google Scholar
Gott, J.R., 1985. Ap.J., 288, 422.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. 1984. Ap.J., 282, 374.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. and Silk, J., 1986. Nature, 324, 529.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. and Stebbins, A., 1984. Nature, 310, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, B. and Partridge, B., 1986. Preprint. Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P. and Vishniac, E.T., 1986. Ap.J., 306, L51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peebles, P.J.E. and Yu, J.T., 1970. Ap.J., 162, 816.Google Scholar
Press, W.H. and Schechter, P., 1974. Ap.J., 187, 425.Google Scholar
Sachs, R.K. and Wolfe, A.M., 1967. Ap.J., 147, 73.Google Scholar
Sunyaev, R.A. and Zel'dovich, Ya.B. 1970. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 7, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suto, Y., Sato, K. and Kodama, H., 1985. Ap.J., 292, L1.Google Scholar
Vittorio, N. and Silk, J., 1984. Ap.J., 285, L35.Google Scholar
Vishniac, E.T., 1987. Preprint. Google Scholar