Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:32:30.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WORD FAMILIES AND LEMMAS, NOT A REAL DILEMMA

INVESTIGATING LEXICAL UNITS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2021

Stuart Webb*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Commentary
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aviad-Levitzky, T., Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2019). The new computer adaptive test of size and strength (CATSS): Development and validationLanguage Assessment Quarterly16, 345368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L., & Nation, P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6, 253279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D. (2015). Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the New General Service List. Applied Linguistics, 36, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2013). Types of words identified as unknown by L2 learners when reading. System, 41, 10431055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D., Stoeckel, T., & McLean, S. (2021). The coming paradigm shift in the use of lexical units. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 950953.Google Scholar
Brown, D., Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Stewart, J. (2020). The most appropriate lexical unit for L2 vocabulary research and pedagogy: A brief review of the evidence. Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T., & Laufer, B. (2021). The Nuclear Word Family List: A list of the most frequent family members, including base and affixed words. Language Learning, 71, 834871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A., Nation, P., & Sim, D. (2015). Measuring the vocabulary size of native speakers of English in New Zealand secondary schoolsNew Zealand Journal of Educational Studies50, 121135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y. (2021). Selecting lexical units in wordlists for EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 954957.Google Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2017). The Academic Spoken Word List. Language Learning, 67, 959997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2016a). Making an essential word list for beginners. In Nation, I. S. P., Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing (pp. 153167, 188–195). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2016b). Evaluating lists of high frequency vocabulary. ITL–International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167, 132158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. (2011–). Most frequent 100,000 word forms in English (based on data from the COCA corpus). https://www.wordfrequency.info/Google Scholar
Derwing, B. L., & Baker, W. J. (1979). Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 209223). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gablasova, D., & Brezina, V. (2021). Words that matter in L2 research and pedagogy: A corpus-linguistics perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 958961.Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age childrenScientific Studies of Reading17, 257285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. M., & Laufer, B. (2003). Type of task, time-on-task and electronic dictionaries in incidental vocabulary acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics41, 87106.Google Scholar
Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S. (2021a). Measuring L1 and L2 productive derivational knowledge: How many derivatives can L1 and L2 learners with differing vocabulary levels produce? TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S. (2021b). To what extent does productive derivational knowledge of adult L1 speakers and L2 learners at two educational levels differ? [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Faculty of Education, University of Western Ontario.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremmel, B. (2016). Word families and frequency bands in vocabulary tests: Challenging conventions. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 976987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremmel, B. (2021). Selling the (word) family silver? A response to Webb’s “lemma dilemma.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 962964.Google Scholar
Kremmel, B., & Schmitt, N. (2016). Interpreting vocabulary test scores: What do various item formats tell us about learners’ ability to employ words? Language Assessment Quarterly, 13, 377392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. (2000). Electronic dictionaries and incidental vocabulary acquisition: Does technology make a difference? In Heid, U., Evert, S., Lehmann, E., Rohrer, C. (Eds.). EURALEX, Proceedings of the 9th EURALEX International Congress (pp. 849854). Institutfür Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Canadian Modern Language Review59, 565585,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. (2021). Lemmas, flemmas, word families and common sense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 965968.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Cobb, T. (2020). How much knowledge of derived words is needed for reading? Applied Linguistics41, 971998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translationApplied Linguistics29, 694716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptivenessLanguage Learning54, 399436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Hill, M. M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning and Technology3, 5876.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Osimo, H. (1991). Facilitating vocabulary retention: The second hand clozeSystem, 19, 217224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2011). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combinationLanguage Teaching Research, 15, 391411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2015). Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledgeLanguage Teaching Research19, 687711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Shmueli, K. (1997). Memorizing new words: does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28, 89108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., Webb, S., Kim, K. S., & Yohanan, B. (2021). How well do learners know derived words in a second language? The effect of proficiency, word frequency and type of affix. ITL–International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 172, 229258. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.20020.lauCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A. (2001). Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. Longman.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D., & Stull, S. (2015). Morphological awareness and children’s writing: Accuracy, error, and invention. Reading and Writing, 28, 271289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLean, S. (2018). Evidence for the adoption of the flemma as an appropriate word counting unit. Applied Linguistics, 39, 823845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, S. (2021). The coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research, and threats to the validity with which it is operationalized. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33, 126140.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Diakidoy, I. A. N., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivativesJournal of Reading Behavior25, 155170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from contextReading Research Quarterly, 20, 233253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nationGoogle Scholar
Nation, P. (2021). Thoughts on word families. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 969972.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. M. H., & Webb, S. (2017). Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research, 21, 298320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavia, N., Webb, S., & Faez, F. (2019). Incidental vocabulary learning from listening to L2 songs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 745768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 3155.Google Scholar
Peters, E., Velghe, T., & Van Rompaey, T. (2019). The VocabLab tests: The development of an English and French vocabulary testITL–International Journal of Applied Linguistics170, 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., & Webb, S. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through watching a single episode of L2 television. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 551577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, B. L., & Wible, D. (2014). Frequency in incidental vocabulary acquisition research: An undefined concept and some consequencesTESOL Quarterly48, 843861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J., Webb, S., & Nakata, T. (2015). Do the cognancy characteristics of loanwords make them more easily learned than noncognates? Language Teaching Research, 19, 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasao, Y., & Webb, S. (2017). The word part levels test. Language Teaching Research, 21, 1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal studyLanguage Learning48, 281317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly36, 145171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoder, P., & Laufer, B. (2021). EFL learners’ receptive knowledge of derived words: The case of Swedish adolescents [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Language Education, Stockholm University and Department of English Language and Literature, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., Nation, P., & Pinchbeck, G. G. (2021). What the research shows about written receptive vocabulary testing: A reply to WebbStudies in Second Language Acquisition43, 462471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Nation, P. (2021). Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledgeStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 181203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36, 1734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, J., & Chuenjundaeng, J. (2009). Suffix knowledge: Acquisition and applications. System, 37, 461469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 4665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2010). Pre-learning low frequency vocabulary in second language television programs. Language Teaching Research, 14, 501515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2021). A different perspective on the limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 454461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL–International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 3470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 6681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar