Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:17:17.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE RETRIEVABILITY OF L2 ENGLISH MULTIWORD ITEMS IN A CONTEXT OF STRONGLY FORM-FOCUSED EXPOSURE

WHAT MATTERS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2020

Seth Lindstromberg Open the ORCID record for Seth Lindstromberg [Opens in a new window]  and
June Eyckmans
Seth Lindstromberg*
Affiliation:
Hilderstone College, United Kingdom
June Eyckmans
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Seth Lindstromberg, Hilderstone College, St Peters Road, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2JW, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although retrieval of lexical forms is a prerequisite for language production, research of L2 vocabulary learning has focused much more on meanings and form-meaning mappings than on development of detailed, accessible mental representations of forms. This is particularly true with respect to multi-word items (MWIs). We report an experimental study involving a variety of intra-lexical, usage-based, and interlingual co-determinants of L2 vocabulary learnability pertaining to MWIs. Each learner (N = 60) encountered a randomly allocated set of 26 two-word MWIs (Nsets = 4) semi-randomly drawn from a larger pool of MWIs. Learners were asked to remember either the 13 MWIs showing the form variable assonance (e.g., change shape) or the 13 nonassonant control MWIs (e.g., sound good). Posttests of form recall revealed a large, durable effect of the focusing task in combination with forewarning of testing. Except when MWI concreteness (a semantic variable) was high, assonance had a positive effect on retrievability in recall tests given after delays of 15 minutes and one week. There was a consistent effect of the semi-semantic variable Mutual Information. Even in the context of a strong focus on forms, form variables are not the only variables that matter.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 43 , Issue 5 , December 2021 , pp. 1040 - 1067
Check for updates
Open Practices
Open data
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful to the students who participated in our study and to everyone who provided ratings of concreteness and similarity. We also thank our reviewers for exceptionally helpful comments and suggestions.

The experiment in this article earned an Open Data badge for transparent practices. The materials are available at https://figshare.com/articles/The_retrievability_of_L2_English_multi-word_items_in_a_context_of_strongly_form-focused_exposure_What_matters_Untitled_Item/12425273 and https://figshare.com/articles/The_retrievability_of_L2_English_multi-word_items_in_a_context_of_strongly_form-focused_exposure_What_matters_Untitled_Item/12435077

References

REFERENCES

Ackermann, K., & Chen, Y.-H. (2013). Developing the Academic MWI List (ACL): A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayçiçeği, A., & Harris, C. (2004). Bilinguals’ recall and recognition of emotion words. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 977–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1999/2014). The essentials of human memory. Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, H., Otten, L., Kousta, S., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and Language, 125, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2015). Lexical input processing and vocabulary learning. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2019). R package lme4 (Version 1.1-21). Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. [Computer software]. https://github.com/lme4/lme4/Google Scholar
Boers, F. (2020). Factors affecting the learning of multiword items. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 143–157). Routledge.Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2005). Finding ways to make phrase-learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration. System, 33, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2012). Are alliterative word combinations comparatively easy to remember for adult learners? RELC Journal, 43, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212439997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2014a). When does assonance make lexical phrases memorable? European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 3, 93–107. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55762736.pdf.Google Scholar
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2014b). Is alliteration mnemonic without awareness-raising? Language Awareness, 23, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.774008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Webb, S. (2014c). Further evidence of the comparative memorability of alliterative expressions in second language learning. RELC Journal, 45, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214522714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40,000 generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casaponsa, A., Antón, E., Pérez, A., & Duñabeitia, J. (2015). Foreign language comprehension achievement: Insights from the cognate facilitation effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(588). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Citron, F. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, J., & Paivio, A. (2004). Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms. Behavior Research Method, Instruments, Computers, 36, 371–383. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125, 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). http://www.americancorpus.orgGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. (2006). Effects of stimulus characteristics and background music on foreign language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 56, 463–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00374.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of words concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50, 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewhurst, S., Brandt, K., & Sharp, M. (2004). Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 32, 1316–1325. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, J., Liu, W., & Yang, Y. (2017). The influence of concreteness of concepts on the integration of novel words into the semantic network. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2011). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02111/full.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2009). To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2013). Second language acquisition . In Trousdale, G. & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 365–378). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43, 559–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00627.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., Simpson‐Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyckmans, J., & Lindstromberg, S. (2017). The power of sound in L2 idiom learning. Language Teaching Research, 21, 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816655831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, F. (2010). Using conventional sequences in L2 French. IRAL, 48, 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldinger, S., Luce, P., Pisoni, D., & Marcario, J. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1211–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.6.1211.Google ScholarPubMed
Gomes, C., Brainerd, C., & Stein, L. (2013). Effects of emotional valence and arousal on recollective and nonrecollective recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028578.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, M. (2019). Phonological patterns and vocabulary learning: Mora and mnemonics. Leuven, Belgium: Paper presented at Vocab@Leuven, Department of Linguistics, KU University.Google Scholar
Gries, S. (2011). Phonological similarity in multi-word symbolic units. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P., Lipinski, J., & Aktunc, E. (2005). Re-examining the phonological similarity effect in serial recall: The roles of type of similarity, category cueing, and item recall. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, F. (2015). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, F. (2019). R package Hmisc (Version 4.2-0). [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/Hmisc.pdfGoogle Scholar
HarperCollins. (2008). A guide to statistics: t-score and mutual information. https://wordbanks.harpercollins.co.uk/other_doc/statistics.htmlGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. (1997). What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy? Intralexical factors affecting the difficulty of vocabulary acquisition. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 140–155). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun MWIs in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61, 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., & Schmitt, N. (2010). The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. (2020). Surplus phonological similarity in English multiword units. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. (2019). Ratings of the emotional valence and arousal of collocations and their constituent words: How can they be useful in L2 vocabulary research. System, 87, 102–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008). The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics, 29, 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2014). How big is the positive effect of assonance on the near-term recall of L2 collocations? ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 165, 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.165.1.02lin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). The particular need for replication in the quantitative study of SLA: A case study of the mnemonic effect of assonance in collocations. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2019). The effect of frequency on learners’ ability to recall the forms of deliberately learned L2 multiword expressions. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 171, 2–33. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.18005.lin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, P., Goldinger, S., Auer, E., & Vitevitch, M. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 615–625. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lüdecke, D., Makowski, D., & Waggoner, P. (2019). R package performance (Version 0.4.0). [Computer software]. https://easystats.github.io/performance/Google Scholar
Lupker, S., & Williams, B. (1989). Rhyme priming of pictures and words: A lexical activation account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1033–1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1033.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: Cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PLoS ONE, 7, e43230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, R., & Murphy, V. (2011). Effect of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 267–290. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5054/tq.2011.247708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestres-Missé, A., Münte, T., & Rodriguez-Fornells, R. (2014). Mapping concrete and abstract meanings to new words using verbal contexts. Second Language Research, 30, 191–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313512668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, R. (1998). Fixed expressions and idioms in English. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nekrasova, T. (2009). English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles. Language Learning, 59, 647–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00520.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of MWIs by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otwinowska, A. (2015). Cognate vocabulary in language acquisition and use. Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 66, 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A., Yuille, J., & Madigan, S. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkinson, D. (Ed.). (2006). Oxford idioms dictionary for learners of English. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, E. (2020). The learning of single word items. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 125–142). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pichette, F., De Serres, L., & Lafontaine, M. (2012). Sentence reading and writing for second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33, 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D., Nusbaum, H., Luce, P., & Slowiaczek, L. (1985). Speech perception, word recognition, and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication, 4, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(85)90037-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponari, M., Norbury, C., & Vigliocco, G., (2018). Acquisition of abstract concepts is influenced by emotional valence. Developmental Science, 21, e12549 https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.6.0). [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, R., & Serfas, D. (2011). R package multicon: Multivariate constructs (Version 1.6). [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/multicon/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Spätgens, T., & Schoonen, R. (2019). Single, but not unrelated: Key issues in researching single word items. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 511–528). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamer, M., & Vitevitch, M. (2012). Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinel, M., Hulstijn, J., & Steinel, W. (2007). Second language idiom learning in a paired-associate paradigm: Effects of direction of learning, direction of testing, idiom imageability, and idiom transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 449–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. (2004). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonzar, C., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2009). L2 vocabulary acquisition in children: Effects of learning method and cognate status. Language Learning, 59, 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00519.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchihara, T., Webb, S., & Yanagisawa, A. (2019). The effects of repetition on incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. Language Learning, 69, 559–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriner, A., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, J. (2018). Possibility of semantic involvement in the L1-L2 congruency effect in the processing of L2 collocations. Journal of Second Language Studies, 1, 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.17024.yamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 647–668. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5054/tq.2010.235998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324576.013.4Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lindstromberg and Eyckmans supplementary material

Lindstromberg and Eyckmans supplementary material

Download Lindstromberg and Eyckmans supplementary material(File)
File 25.2 KB