Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Wolfe-Quintero, Kate
1996.
Nativism does not equal Universal Grammar.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
335.
Bergström, Anna
1997.
L’influence des distinctions aspectuelles sur l’acquisition des temps en français langue étrangère.
Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère,
p.
51.
Cumming, Alister
1998.
Theoretical Perspectives on Writing.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 18,
Issue. ,
p.
61.
Salaberry, M.
1998.
The Development of Aspectual Distinctions in L2 French Classroom Learning.
The Canadian Modern Language Review,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 4,
p.
508.
Svalberg, Agneta M‐L
and
Chuchu, Hjh Fatimah bte hj awg
1998.
Are English and Malay worlds apart? Typological distance and the learning of tense and aspect concepts.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
27.
Salaberry, M.Rafael
2000.
The acquisition of English past tense in an instructional setting.
System,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
2000.
The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect.
Lakshmanan, Usha
and
Selinker, Larry
2001.
Analysing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know?.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
393.
Luque, Gloria
2001.
La historia corta para evaluar la competencia oral en el aula de inglés.
Cultura y Educación,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
195.
Lardiere, Donna
2003.
Revisiting the comparative fallacy: a reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker, 2001.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
129.
Wårvik, Brita
2004.
Approaches to Cognition through Text and Discourse.
p.
99.
Ishida, Midori
2004.
Effects of Recasts on the Acquisition of the Aspectual Form ‐te i‐(ru) by Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language.
Language Learning,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 2,
p.
311.
Clachar, Arlene
2005.
Creole English Speakers’ Treatment of Tense‐Aspect Morphology in English Interlanguage Written Discourse.
Language Learning,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 2,
p.
275.
Comajoan, Llorenç
2006.
The Aspect Hypothesis: Development of Morphology and Appropriateness of Use.
Language Learning,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
201.
Sugaya, Natsue
and
Shirai, Yasuhiro
2007.
THE ACQUISITION OF PROGRESSIVE AND RESULTATIVE MEANINGS OF THE IMPERFECTIVE ASPECT MARKER BY L2 LEARNERS OF JAPANESE: Transfer, Universals, or Multiple Factors?.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 01,
Shirai, Yasuhiro
2007.
The Aspect Hypothesis, the comparative fallacy and the validity of obligatory context analysis: a reply to Lardiere, 2003.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 1,
p.
51.
Haznedar, Belma
2007.
The acquisition of tense—aspect in child second language English.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
383.
Rothman, Jason
and
Iverson, Michael
2008.
Poverty-of-the-Stimulus and SLA Epistemology: Considering L2 Knowledge of Aspectual Phrasal Semantics.
Language Acquisition,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 4,
p.
270.
안수진
2009.
An Analysis of the Use of Cohesive and Written Discourse Features by Korean EFL Learners.
The Journal of Studies in Language,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
601.
Spada, Nina
and
Tomita, Yasuyo
2010.
Interactions Between Type of Instruction and Type of Language Feature: A Meta‐Analysis.
Language Learning,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 2,
p.
263.