Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:18:32.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MORPHOLOGY AND LONGER DISTANCE DEPENDENCIES

Laboratory Research Illuminating the A in SLA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1997

Nick C. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Bangor
Richard Schmidt
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i at Manoa

Abstract

This paper illustrates the advantages of laboratory research into SLA by describing two studies of acquisition of second language syntax. The first addresses the question of whether human morphological abilities can be understood in terms of associative processes or whether it is necessary to postulate rule-based symbol processing systems underlying these skills. We demonstrate that acquisition of L2 morphology shows frequency effects for both regular and irregular forms and that the acquisition course of learners' accuracy and reaction time can be accurately simulated by connectionist systems. The second concerns a bootstrapping account of SLA whereby processes of chunking in phonological memory underpin the acquisition of long-term memory for utterances and abstractions of grammatical regularities. It shows that phonological short-term memory is particularly important in the acquisition of long-distance dependencies. In both cases, it is argued that these aspects of SLA reflect associative learning processes. When SLA research is properly focused on acquisition, laboratory research allows investigation of the learners' exposure to evidence, their processes of perception and learning, and their resultant language representations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was assisted by grant R000236099 from the Economic and Social Research Council (UK) to the first author. We thank Martin Wilson, Julie Ainscough, and Ernest Lee for help with administering the experiments and Robert Bley-Vroman, Kevin Gregg, Robert DeKeyser, and Jan Hulstijn for comments on a prior draft of this paper.