Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:35:15.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MEASURING UNIVERSITY-LEVEL L2 LEARNERS’ IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2014

Runhan Zhang
Runhan Zhang*
Affiliation:
Central University of Finance and Economics
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Runhan Zhang, School of Foreign Studies, Central University of Finance and Economics, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although many theoretical issues revolving around implicit and explicit knowledge in second language (L2) acquisition hinge on the ability to measure these two types of knowledge, few empirical studies have attempted to do so. However, R. Ellis (2005) did develop a battery of tests intended to provide relatively separate measures. This study aims to validate the use of Ellis’s test battery in an English as a foreign language context and to investigate the extent of Chinese first-year university students’ implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Test scores loaded on two factors, as in R. Ellis (2005), thus demonstrating construct validity for the tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge in a population of Chinese university-level learners of English in a Chinese (as opposed to English as a second language) context. These learners were found to have higher scores on measures of explicit knowledge than on those of implicit knowledge because of the instruction they had received and their English learning environment.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 457 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alderson, J. C., Steel, D., & Clapham, C. (1997). Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 1, 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning, 28, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M. A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C., & Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge of an L2 and language proficiency. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 167–193). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (Ed.). (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2008). Implicit and explicit knowledge about language. In Cenoz, J. & Hornberger, N. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 119–131). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54, 227–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008a). Explicit knowledge and second language learning and pedagogy. In Cenoz, J. & Hornberger, N. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 143–153). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008b). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009a). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009b). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 31–64). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Loewen, S. (2007). Confirming the operational definitions of explicit and implicit knowledge in Ellis (2005): Responding to Isemonger. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erçetin, G., & Alptekin, C. (2013). The explicit/implicit knowledge distinction and working memory: Implications for second-language reading comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 727–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, X. (2012). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge, and achievement in second language (L2) Spanish. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15, 20–41.Google Scholar
Han, Y., & Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 347–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isemonger, I. (2007). Operational definitions of explicit and implicit knowledge: Response to Ellis (2005) and some recommendations for future research in this area. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis issues and implication. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrory, G., & Stone, V. (2000). Pupil progress in the acquisition of the perfect tense in French: The relationship between knowledge and use. Language Teaching Research, 4, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milasi, A. F., & Pishghadam, R. (2007). The interplay between explicit and implicit knowledge of English native speakers and ESL learners. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 15–43.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications of bilingualism and SLA. In Ellis, N. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–419). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Neurolinguistic aspects of bilingualism. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, A. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. K. (1999, January). Basic concepts of confirmatory factor analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED427091.pdfGoogle Scholar
Roehr, K. (2008). Metalinguistic knowledge and language ability in university-level L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 29, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case-study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375–409). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (2013). SLA research and L2 pedagogy: Misapplications and questions of relevance. Language Teaching. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S026144481200050XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhr, D. D. (2006). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? In LeBouton, K. J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-first annual SAS Users Group International Conference (pp. 200–231). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Zobl, H. (1995). Converging evidence for the “acquisition–learning” distinction. Applied Linguistics, 16, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar