Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:26:11.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

L2 ACQUISITION OF PROSODIC PROPERTIES OF SPEECH RHYTHM

Evidence from L1 Mandarin and German Learners of English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Aike Li  and
Brechtje Post
Aike Li
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Brechtje Post*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Brechtje Post, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Modern and Medieval Languages, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the development of speech rhythm in second language (L2) learners of typologically different first languages (L1s) at different levels of proficiency. An empirical investigation of durational variation in L2 English productions by L1 Mandarin learners and L1 German learners compared to native control values in English and the learners’ L1s showed that the L1 groups followed comparable developmental paths in their acquisition of vocalic variability and accentual lengthening. However, the two L1 groups diverged in the proportion of vocalic materials in their L2 utterances, exhibiting L2 acquisition patterns that are consistent with direct transfer from the L1. The results support a multisystemic model of L2 rhythm acquisition in which the various linguistic-systemic properties that contribute to speech rhythm are acquired at different proficiency levels and depend on different acquisition processes with respect to L1 influence and universal effects. We conclude that theories of L2 phonology need to be able to accommodate the multisystemic nature of L2 prosodic acquisition. Additionally, L2 phonological acquisition theories, and SLA theories more generally, should take into account the nonuniform manner in which the various prosodic properties of the interlanguage reflect L1 transfer effects as well as universal constraints on acquisition.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 36 , Issue 2: Beyond Segments: Prosody in SLA , June 2014 , pp. 223 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are very grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article and to Professor Wu, Minsu and Dr. Ma, Jianli at the Communication University of China as well as Mr. Rolf Nagels, Mrs. Isabel Farhadi, and Mrs. Annika Woköck at the Gymnasium am Stadtpark in Krefeld, Germany, for their help and support with data collection.

References

REFERENCES

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, H. (2006). The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (1994). A formal model of learning L2 prosodic phonology. Second Language Research, 10, 215–240.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2009). Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica, 66, 46–63.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2012a). Rhythm classes and speech perception. In Niebuhr, O. (Ed.), Understanding prosody: The role of context, function and communication (pp. 75–92). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2012b). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 351–373.Google Scholar
Backman, N. E. (1979). Intonation errors in second language pronunciation of eight Spanish speaking adults learning English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 4, 239–266.Google Scholar
Barry, W. J. (2007). Rhythm as an L2 problem: How prosodic is it? In Trouvain, J. & Gut, U. (Eds.), Non-native prosody: Phonetic description and teaching practice (pp. 97–120). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barry, W., Andreeva, B., & Koreman, J. (2009). Do rhythm metrics reflect perceived rhythm? Phonetica, 66, 78–94.Google Scholar
Barry, W. J., Andreeva, B., Russo, M., Dimitrova, S., & Kostadinova, T. (2003). Do rhythm measures tell us anything about language type? In Solé, M., Recasens, D., & Romero, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (pp. 2693–2696). Barcelona: Universitat Autonomá de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Barry, W., Andreeva, B., & Steiner, I. (2007, August). The phonetic exponency of phrasal accentuation in French and German. Paper presented at the 8th annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (1992). Evidence for speech rhythms across languages. In Tohkura, Y., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Sagisaka, Y. (Eds.), Speech perception, production and linguistic structure (pp. 457–463). Oxford: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Benet, A., Gabriel, C., Kireva, E., & Pešková, A. (2012). Prosodic transfer from Italian to Spanish: Rhythmic properties of L2 speech and Argentinean Porteño. In Ma, Q., Ding, H., & Hirst, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 438–441). Shanghai, China: Tongji University Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct-realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1965). Pitch accent and sentence rhythm. In Abe, I. & Kanekiyo, T. (Eds.), Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order (pp. 139–180). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2006). Durational adjustment under corrective focus in standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 176–201.Google Scholar
Cumming, R. E. (2010). Speech rhythm: The language-specific integration of pitch and duration (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dasher, R., & Bolinger, D. (1982). On pre-accentual lengthening. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 12, 58–71.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalysed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M. (1987, August). Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a Dynamic Systems Theory perspective. In Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4, 183–198.Google Scholar
Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for ∆C. In Karnowski, P. & Szigeti, I. (Eds.), Language and language processing: Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium, Piliscsaba 2003 (pp. 231–241). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S. (2007). The phonology of standard Chinese (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., & Nord, L. (1991). Durational correlates of stress in Swedish, French and English. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 351–365.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Frota, S., & Vigário, M. (2001). On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: The European/Brazilian Portuguese case. Probus, 13, 247–275.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., Gut, U., Post, B., & Watson, I. (2001). The acquisition of rhythm in English, French and German. In Barrière, I., Morgan, G., Chiat, S., & Woll, B. (Eds.), Current research in language and communication: Proceedings of the Child Language Seminar 1999 (pp. 156–162). London: City University.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 7, 515–546.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., Watson, I., & Post, B. (1999). The acquisition of rhythmic patterns in English and French. In Ohala, J. J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D., & Bailey, A. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1201–1204). San Francisco: University of California.Google Scholar
Grenon, I., & White, L. (2008). Acquiring rhythm: A comparison of L1 and L2 speakers of Canadian English and Japanese. In Chan, H., Jacob, H., & Kapia, E. (Eds.), BUCLD 32: Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 155–166). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Grosser, W. (1993). Aspects of intonational L2 acquisition. In Kettemann, B. & Wieden, W. (Eds.), Current issues in European second language acquisition research (pp. 81–94). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Guilbault, C. P. G. (2002). The acquisition of French rhythm by English second language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C., & Jacobs, H. (2005). Understanding phonology (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2007). Learner corpora in second language prosody research and teaching. In Trouvain, J. & Gut, U. (Eds.), Non-native prosody: Phonetic description and teaching practice (pp. 145–167). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2012). Rhythm in L2 speech. In Gibbon, D., Hirst, D., & Campbell, N. (Eds.), Speech and language technology: Volume 14/15, special edition. Rhythm, melody and harmony in speech. Studies in honour of Wiktor Jassem (pp. 83–94). Poznań, Poland: Polskie Towarzystwo Fonetyczne.Google Scholar
Kijak, A. (2009). How stressful is L2 stress? A cross-linguistic study of L2 perception and production of metrical systems. Utrecht, the Netherlands: LOT.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. (1982). Rhythmus im Deutschen [Rhythm in German]. Arbeitsberichte, Institut für Phonetik der Universität Kiel, 19, 89–106.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1983). Prosodic boundary signals in German. Phonetica, 40, 89–134.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Lepetit, D. (1989). Cross-linguistic influence on intonation: French/Japanese and French/English. Language Learning, 39, 397–413.Google Scholar
Lin, H., & Wang, Q. (2007). Mandarin rhythm: An acoustic study. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing, 17(3), 127–140.Google Scholar
Lin, H., & Wang, Q. (2008, April). Interlanguage rhythm in the English production of Mandarin speakers. Paper presented at the 8th Phonetic Conference of China and the International Symposium of Phonetic Frontiers, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Low, E. L. (1998). Prosodic prominence in Singapore English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Low, E. L., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech, 43, 377–401.Google Scholar
Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 543–563.Google Scholar
Mennen, I. (2006). Phonetic and phonological influences in non-native intonation: An overview for language teachers. QMUC Speech Science Research Centre Working Papers, WP-9, 1–17.Google Scholar
Mok, P. (2009). On the syllable-timing of Cantonese and Beijing Mandarin. Chinese Journal of Phonetics, 2, 148–154.Google Scholar
Nolan, F., & Asu, E. L. (2009). The pairwise variability index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica, 66, 64–77.Google Scholar
Oxford University Press. (2011). Oxford online placement test. Retrieved from www.oxfordenglishtesting.com.Google Scholar
Pater, J. (1997). Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. In Hannahs, S. J. & Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition (pp. 235–261). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Payne, E., Post, B., Prieto, P., Vanrell, M., & Astruc, L. (2012). Measuring child rhythm. Language and Speech, 55, 203–229.Google Scholar
Peterson, G. E., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693–703.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Post, B., Payne, E., Astruc, L., Prieto, P., & Vanrell, M. (2013). Constructing rhythm: The integration of prosodic and segmental timing in acquisition. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Vanrell, M., Astruc, L., Payne, E., & Post, B. (2012). Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm: Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Communication, 54, 681–702.Google Scholar
Purpura, J. (n.d.). The Oxford Online Placement Test: What does it measure and how? Retrieved from Oxford University Press Oxford English Testing website: http://www.oxfordenglishtesting.com/uploadedfiles/6_New_Look_and_Feel/Content/oopt_measure.pdf Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (2003). The psychological reality of rhythm classes: Perceptual studies. In Solé, M., Recasens, D., & Romero, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 337–342). Barcelona: Universitat Autonomá de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265–292.Google Scholar
Rasier, L. (2003). Le système accentuel de l’interlangue d’apprenants francophones du néerlandais [The accentual system of the interlanguage of French learners of Dutch]. In Mettouchi, A. & Ferré, G. (Eds.), Actes du colloque international “Interfaces prosodiques” (pp. 79–84). Nantes, France: Acoustique, Acquisition, Interprétation.Google Scholar
Rasier, L., & Hiligsmann, P. (2007). Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2: Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française, 28, 41–66.Google Scholar
Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction between “stress-timed” and “syllable-timed” languages. In Crystal, D. (Ed.), Linguistic controversies. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sarmah, P., Gogio, D. V., & Wiltshire, C. (2009). Thai English: Rhythm and vowels. English World-Wide, 30, 196–217.Google Scholar
Stockmal, V., Markus, D., & Bond, D. (2005). Measures of native and non-native rhythm in a quantity language. Language and Speech, 48, 55–63.Google Scholar
Turk, A. E., & White, L. (1999). Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 171–206.Google Scholar
Van der Pas, B., Wissing, D., & Zonneveld, W. (2000). Parameter resetting in metrical phonology: The case of Setswana and English. South African Journal of Linguistics, S38, 55–87.Google Scholar
van Santen, J. P. H., & Shih, C. (2000). Suprasegmental and segmental timing models in Mandarin Chinese and American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1012–1026.Google Scholar
White, L., & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 501–522.Google Scholar
White, L., Mattys, S. L., & Wiget, L. (2012). Language categorization by adults is based on sensitivity to durational cues, not rhythm class. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 665–679.Google Scholar
Wightman, C. W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Price, P. J. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 1707–1717.Google Scholar