Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:17:50.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE FINE-TUNING OF LINGUISTIC EXPECTATIONS OVER THE COURSE OF L2 LEARNING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2016

Tania Leal ,
Roumyana Slabakova  and
Thomas A. Farmer
Tania Leal*
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Roumyana Slabakova
Affiliation:
University of Southampton University of Iowa
Thomas A. Farmer
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tania Leal, University of Nevada, Reno, Department of World Languages and Literatures, Mail Stop 0100, Reno NV 89557-0100. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the degree to which native-English-speaking learners of Spanish can generate expectations for information likely to occur in upcoming portions of an unfolding linguistic signal. We examine Spanish clitic left dislocation, a long-distance dependency between a topicalized object and an agreeing clitic, whose felicity depends on the discourse. Using a self-paced reading task, we tested the predictions of the shallow structure hypothesis (Clahsen & Felser, 2006a, 2006b) and the reduced ability to generate expectations hypothesis (Grüter, Rohde, & Schafer, 2014). Learners successfully demonstrated sensitivity to the violation of expectations set up by the syntactic and discourse context. In addition, the behavior of the second language (L2) learners was dependent on proficiency: the higher their proficiency, the more their behavior mirrored native-speaker processing. These results support a view of SLA in which knowledge of L2 discourse-grammatical relationships is acquired slowly over the course of L2 learning.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 493 - 525
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–483.Google Scholar
AlFallay, I. (2004). The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self- and peer-assessment. System, 32(3), 407–425.Google Scholar
Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264.Google Scholar
Arai, M., & Keller, F. (2013). The use of verb-specific information for prediction in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 525–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive psychology, 17(3), 364–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 55, 1–9.Google Scholar
Bicknell, K., Elman, J. L., Hare, M., McRae, K., & Kutas, M. (2010). Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 489–505.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006b). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564–570.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dallas, A. C. (2008). Influences of verbal properties on second-language filler-gap resolution: A cross-methodological study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
Dallas, A. C., DeDe, G., & Nicol, J. (2013). An event-related-potential (ERP) investigation of filler-gap processing in native and second language learners. Language Learning, 63, 766–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (2014, October). Electrophysiological changes during word or grammar learning and the role of feedback. Plenary talk presented at the Second Language in the Brain symposium, University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
Dell, G., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0394.Google Scholar
DeLong, K., Urbach, T., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121.Google Scholar
Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkänen, L. (2009). Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110(3), 293–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., Farmer, T. A., & Pylkkänen, L. (2010). Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality. Psychological Science, 21(5), 629–634.Google Scholar
Dussias, P., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(32), 12203–12208.Google Scholar
Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491–505.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 348–368.Google Scholar
Ferretti, T. R., Rohde, H., Kehler, A., & Crutchley, M. (2009). Verb aspect, event structure, and coreferential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 191–205.Google Scholar
Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PloS One, 8(10), 1–18.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1461–1469.Google ScholarPubMed
Franceschina, F. (2005). Fossilized second language grammars: The acquisition of grammatical gender. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Schafer, A. J. (2014). The role of discourse-level expectations in non-native speakers’ referential choices. In Orman, W. & Valleau, M. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 179–191). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Schafer, A. J. (in press). Coreference and discourse coherence in L2: The roles of grammatical aspect and referential form. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic early parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language Technologies (pp. 1–8). Assoc. for Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2009). Second language acquisition of morphosyntax. In Ritchie, W. & Baktia, T. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–233). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Hoover, M. L., & Dwivedi, V. D. (1998). Syntactic processing by skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22(3), 369–397.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. (2008). Proficiency level and the interaction of lexical and morphosyntactic information during L2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 58(4), 875–909.Google Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238.Google Scholar
Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 257–282.Google Scholar
Kaan, E., Dallas, A. C., & Wijnen, F. (2010). Syntactic predictions in second-language sentence processing. In Zwart, J.-W. & de Vries, M. (Eds.), Structure preserved: Festschrift in the honor of Jan Koster (pp. 207–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 647–670.Google Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2013). CLLD as a window on the left periphery. In Howe, C., Blackwell, S. E., & Quesada, M. Libbers (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 310–327). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kimball, J. (1975). Predictive analysis and over-the-top parsing. In Kimball, J. (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, 5. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leal Méndez, T., Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2015). Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish. Lingua, 155, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3(2004), 75–114.Google Scholar
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 447–464.Google Scholar
Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013). Second language sentence processing in reading for comprehension and translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 518–537.Google Scholar
Martin, C., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142.Google Scholar
Mulder, K., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Linguistic skills of adult native speakers, as a function of age and level of education. Applied Linguistics, 32(5), 475–494.Google Scholar
Pablos, L. (2006). Pre-verbal structure building in Romance languages and Basque (Unpublished dissertation). The University of Maryland, College Park, PA.Google Scholar
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. J. (2010). Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2728–2744.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1995). Language acquisition. In Gleitman, L. & Liberman, M. (Eds.), Language: An invitation to cognitive science, (pp. 135–182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pliatsikas, C., & Marinis, T. (2013). Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 167–182.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Truncation and missing inflection in second language acquisition. In Friedmann, M. A. & Rizzi, L. (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax (pp. 202–235). London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rohde, H., Kehler, A., & Elman, J. L. (2006). Event structure and discourse coherence biases in pronoun interpretation. In Sun, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 617–622). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rossi, E., Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2014). Clitic pronouns reveal the time course of processing gender and number in a second language. Neuropsychologia, 62, 11–25.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2009). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences? L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 951–973.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2015). The effect of construction frequency and native transfer on second language knowledge of the syntax–discourse interface. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 671–699.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J. (2012). Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface. Second Language Research, 28(3), 319–343.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (2007). Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Staub, A., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2006). Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either … or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 425–436.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443–467.Google Scholar
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M., & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y. K. I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(1), 105–133.Google Scholar
Zagona, K. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zangl, R., Klarman, L., Thal, D. J., Fernald, A., & Bates, E. (2005). Dynamics of word comprehension in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(2), 179–208.Google Scholar