Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:46:25.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feedback on Writing

The Use of Verbal Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Andrew D. Cohen
Andrew D. Cohen
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The article first calls attention to research on learner strategies and to the significant role that verbal report data have played in such research. While various research methods have been used to describe such strategies, verbal report measures are being used more and more as a means for describing cognitive processes in such areas as communicating, translating, test taking, and language learning. The article focuses just on the use of verbal report in describing learner strategies in language learning and language using. It is noted that information on learner strategies has evolved from partially intuited lists of strategies to empirically derived taxonomies that have as their ultimate purpose that of training learners to be more successful at language learning. Second, the controversy regarding the use of verbal report measures is discussed. Finally, the article describes a study that employed a variety of verbal report measures in an effort to understand better the strategies that teachers use in giving feedback on compositions and the strategies that learners use in handling this feedback in the English-foreign-languge and Portuguese-native-language classrooms, respectively.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 133 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afflerbach, P., & Johnston, P. (1984). On the use of verbal reports in reading research. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. J. (1989). Reading comprehension tests versus academic reading: What are second language readers doing? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (1985). Performance on cloze tests with fixed-ratio and rational deletions. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakan, D. (1954). A reconsideration of the problem of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 50(3), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bōrsch, S. (1986). Introspective methods in research on interlingual and intercultural communication. In House, J. & Blum-Kulka, S. (Eds.), Interlingual and intercultural communication (pp. 195–209). Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Cardelle, M., & Corno, L. (1981). Effects on second language learning of variations in written feedback on homework assignments. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalcanti, M. C. (1984). Frames and schemes in FL reading. Anais V ENPULI (Vol. 2, 486–506). São Paulo, Brazil: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Sāo Paulo.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, M. C. (1987). Investigating FL reading performance through pause protocols. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 230–250). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1980). Testing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1984). On taking language tests: What the students report. Language Testing, 1, 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1987a). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In Wenden, A. L. & Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 57–69). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1987b). Studying language learning strategies: How do we get the information? In Wenden, A. L. & Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 31–40). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. New York: Newbury House/HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (in press). English testing in Brazil: Problems in using summary tasks. In Hill, C. & Parry, K. (Eds.), The test at the gate: Ethnographic perspectives on the assessment of English literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Aphek, E. (1979). Easifying second language learning (Report submitted to the Jacob Hiatt Institute). Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem, School of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 163 753)Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Aphek, E. (1981). Easifying second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. (1987). Giving and getting feedback on compositions: A comparison of teacher and student verbal report. Evaluation and Research in Education, 1(2), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In Kroll, B. (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Hosenfeld, C. (1981). Some uses of mentalistic data in second-language research, language Learning, 31, 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Robbins, M. (1976). Toward assessing interlanguage performance: The relationship between selected errors, learners’ characteristics, and the learners’ explanations. Language Learning, 26, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrin, D. N. (1986). Protocols once more. College English, 48, 713–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1988). Concurrent verbal reports on text comprehension: A review. Text, 8, 295–325.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). On identifying communication strategies in interlanguage production. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 210–238). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Faerch, C, & Kasper, G. (1986). One learner–two languages: Investigating types of interlanguage knowledge. In House, J. & Blum-Kulka, S. (Eds.), Interlingual and intercultural communication (pp. 211–227). Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1987). From product to process-Introspective methods in second language research. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 5–23). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Fanselow, J. F. (1977). Beyond RASHOMON-Conceptualizing and describing the teaching act. TESOL Quarterly, 11, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, U., & Stemmer, B. (1987). Thin—aloud a—retrospective da—in C-te—taking: Diffe—languages—–diff—learners–sa—approaches? In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 251–267). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Gerloff, P. (1987). Identifying the unit of analysis in translation: Some uses of think-aloud protocol data. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 135–158). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Goodman, K. (1988). The reading process. In Carrell, P., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 11–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, C. (1987). The effect of testing method on achievement in reading comprehension tests in English as a foreign language. Unpublished master's thesis, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
Hillocks, G. Jr, (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.Google Scholar
Homburg, T. J., & Spaan, M. C. (1981). ESL reading proficiency assessment: Testing strategies. In Hines, M. & Rutherford, W. (Eds.), On TESOL 81 (pp. 25–33). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Hosenfeld, C. (1979). Cindy: A learner in today's foreign language classroom. In Born, W. (Ed.), The foreign language learner in today's classroom environment. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference Reports. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 185 837)Google Scholar
Hosenfeld, C. (1984). Case studies of ninth grade readers. In Alderson, J. C. & Urquhart, A. H. (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 231–249). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jacobs, H. L, Zingraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. R., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Krings, H. P. (1987). The use of introspective data in translation. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 159–176). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. A. (1979). Behaviorism and the mind: A (limited) call for a return to introspection. American Psychologist, 34, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, W. (1986). The disappearance of introspection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mann, S. J. (1982). Verbal reports as data: A focus on retrospection. In Dingwall, S. & Mann, S. (Eds.), Methods and problems in doing applied linguistic research (pp. 87–104). Lancaster, U.K.: Dept. of Linguistics and Modern English Language, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J., & Arthur, S. (1977). Teacher comments on student essays: It doesn't matter what you say. Denver, CO: University of Colorado at Denver. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 147 864)Google Scholar
Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner (Research in Education Series No. 7). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Neubach, A., & Cohen, A. D. (1988). Processing strategies and problems encountered in the use of dictionaries. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America, 10, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevo, N. (1989). Test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice test of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 6, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, G. M., Duffy, S. A., & Mack, R. L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In Kieras, D. E. & Just, M. A. (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 253–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. (1985). A new taxonomy of second language learning strategies. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Oxford, R., & Cohen, A. D. (forthcoming). Language learning strategies: Crucial issues of concept and definition. Invited paper submitted to Ervin, G. L. (Ed.), International perspectives on foreign language education. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R., Nyikos, M., & Crookall, D. (1987, April). Learning strategies of university foreign language students: A large-scale study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of TESOL, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1986). An interactional approach to the teaching of writing. English Teaching Forum, 24, 6–10.Google Scholar
Poulisse, N. (1989). The use of compensatory strategies by Dutch learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Poulisse, N., Bongaerts, T., & Kellerman, E. (1987). The use of retrospective verbal reports in the analysis of compensatory strategies. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 213–229). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Radecki, P., & Swales, J. (1986). ESL student reaction and response to feedback on their written work. Papers in Applied Linguistics—Michigan, 1(2), 69–86.Google Scholar
Radford, J. (1974). Reflections on introspection. American Psychologist, 29, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, A. G. (1986). Language learning strategies used by adolescents studying French in New York schools. Foreign Language Annals, 19, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seliger, H. W. (1983). The language learner as linguist: Of metaphors and realities. Applied Linguistics, 4, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, P. (1989). The reliability and validity of protocol analysis. Written Communication, 6, 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, E. R. (1986). Protocols, retrospective reports, and the stream of consciousness. College English, 48, 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1912). The schema of introspection. American Journal of Psychology, 23, 485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyacke, M., & Mendelsohn, D. (1986). Student needs: Cognitive as well as communicative.TESL Canada Journal (Special Issue 1), 171–183.Google Scholar
Waern, Y. (1988). Thoughts on text in context: Applying the think-aloud method in text processing. Text, 8, 327–350.Google Scholar
Wenden, A. L. (1985). Learner strategies. TESOL Newsletter, 19(5), 1–7.Google Scholar
Wenden, A. L. (1986a). Incorporating learner training in the classroom. System, 14, 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenden, A. L. (1986b). What do second-language learners know about their language learning? A second look at retrospective accounts. Applied Linguistics, 7, 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenden, A. L. (1987). A curricular framework for promoting learner autonomy. Jamaica, NY: York University.Google Scholar
Willing, K. (1989). Teaching how to learn: Learning strategies in ESL (teachers guide, activity worksheets). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar