Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:34:20.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE EFFECTS OF LEARNING CONTEXTS ON MORPHOSYNTACTIC AND LEXICAL DEVELOPMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2004

Joseph Collentine
Joseph Collentine
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Context of learning, such as whether a learner studies a second language (L2) in a formal classroom—“at home” or abroad—may be a key factor in developing grammatical and lexical abilities. Yet, little empirical data is available comparing the effects of study abroad (SA) and formal instruction “at home” (AH) experiences on such development (Freed, 1995). The scant research that exists presents conflicting results (DeKeyser, 1986, 1991; Isabelli, 2002; Lennon, 1990; Regan, 1995; Ryan & Lafford, 1992; Schell, 2001). This paper provides a multivariate analysis (see Biber, 1988) of the effects of learning context on grammatical and lexical abilities in oral conversational discourse. The data compare the abilities of two groups before and after studying Spanish as an L2 for approximately one semester (N = 46): (a) a SA group in Alicante, Spain, and (b) a formal-classroom AH group at an American university. The corpus comprises oral segments produced by the learners in an Oral Proficiency Interview before and after the experimental period. In a corpus-based analysis, each segment was transcribed and tagged for various lexical and grammatical features. In two discriminant analyses, I identified various grammatical and lexical features that differentiated the two groups in terms of program gains. The results indicated that the AH context facilitated more development on discrete grammatical and lexical features. However, quantitative discourse analyses of the corpus revealed that the SA group achieved better narrative abilities and could produce language that was more semantically dense. The data are explained in consideration of the SA group's improved fluency and sociolinguistic pressures that distinguished its learning conditions.I would like to express my gratitude to the Council on International Educational Exchange, Barbara F. Freed, and Norman Segalowitz, whose sponsorship and support for the experiment reported here made this article possible. I also would like to thank Barbara F. Freed, Barbara Lafford, Norman Segalowitz, and the two anonymous SSLA reviewers for the valuable feedback on earlier versions of this article. Special thanks is due to Nicole Lazar for her expertise in planning and interpreting the statistical procedures reported in this article.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 227 - 248
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2001). Introduction: Multidimensional analysis and the study of register variation. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multidimensional studies (pp. 3–13). London: Longman.
Brecht, R. D., & Davidson, D. (1991, March). Language acquisition gains in study abroad: Program assessment and modification. Paper presented at the National Foreign Language Center (NFLC) conference on language testing, Washington, DC.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Collentine, J. (2003). The development of subjunctive and complex-syntactic abilities among FL Spanish learners. In B. Lafford & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Studies in Spanish second language acquisition: The state of the science (pp. 74–97). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Collentine, J., Collentine, K., Clark, V., & Fruginal, E. (2002). Subjunctive instruction enhanced with syntactic instruction. In J. Lee, K. Geeslin, & J. C. Clements (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 32–45). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Cook, V. J. (1997). Inside language. London: Arnold.
Crick, F. H. C. (1979). Thinking about the brain. Scientific American, 241, 181–188.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1986). From learning to acquisition? Foreign language development in a U.S. classroom and during a semester abroad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
DeKeyser, R. (1991). Foreign language development during a semester abroad. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 104–119). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Ellis, N. C. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: Word structure, collocation, word-class, and meaning. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 122–139). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Freed, B. F. (1990). Language learning in a study abroad context: The effects of interactive and noninteractive out-of-class contact on grammatical achievement and oral proficiency. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics: Linguistics, language teaching, and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice, and research (pp. 459–477). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Freed, B. F. (1995). Language learning and study abroad. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 3–33). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Freed, B. F. (1998). An overview of issues and research in language learning in a study abroad setting. Frontiers, 4, 31–60.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1999). Discussion: Incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 319–333.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. (2002). The acquisition of Spanish copula choice and its relationship to language change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 419–450.Google Scholar
Gili Gaya, S. (1972). Estudios de lenguaje infantil [Studies of child language]. Barcelona: Bibliograf.
Golonka, E. (2001). Identification of salient linguistic and metalinguistic variables in the prediction of oral proficiency gain at the advanced-level threshold among adult learners of Russian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bryn Mawr College, PA.
Guitart, J. (1982). On the use of the Spanish subjunctive among Spanish-English bilinguals. Word, 33, 59–67.Google Scholar
Guntermann, G. (1992). An analysis of interlanguage development over time: Part 1—por and para. Hispania, 75, 177–187.Google Scholar
Howard, M. (2001). The effects of study abroad on the L2 learner's structural skills: Evidence from advanced learners of French. EUROSLA Yearbook, 1, 123–141.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing, and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193–223.Google Scholar
Ife, A., Vives Boix, G., & Meara, P. (2000). The impact of study abroad on the vocabulary development of different proficiency groups. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 4, 55–84.Google Scholar
Isabelli, C. (2002). The impact of a study-abroad experience on the acquisition of L2 Spanish syntax: The null subject parameter. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Isabelli, C. L. (2001). Motivation and extended interaction in the study abroad context: Factors in the development of Spanish language accuracy and communication skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Johnson, M. (2001). The art of nonconversation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jordens, P. (1997). Introducing the basic variety. Second Language Research, 13, 289–300.Google Scholar
Kaplan, M. A. (1989). French in the community: A survey of language use abroad. The French Review, 63, 290–301.Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The Basic Variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13, 301–334.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2000). Social discursive constructions of self in L2 learning. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 133–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lafford, B., & Collentine, J. (1989). The telltale targets: An analysis of access errors in the speech of intermediate students of Spanish. Lenguas Modernas, 16, 143–162.Google Scholar
Lennon, P. (1990). The advanced learner at large in the L2 community: Developments in spoken performance. IRAL, 28, 309–324.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the Competition Model. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.) Tutorial in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 113–142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marriot, H. (1995). Acquisition of politeness patterns by exchange students in Japan. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 197–224). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Milleret, M. (1991). Assessing the gain in oral proficiency from summer foreign study. Association of Departments of Foreign Languages (ADFL) Bulletin, 22, 39–43.Google Scholar
Milton, J., & Meara, P. (1995). How periods abroad affect vocabulary growth in a foreign language. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 107–108, 17–34.Google Scholar
Möhle, D. (1984). A comparison of the second language speech of different native speakers. In H. W. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language productions (pp. 26–49). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Möhle, D., & Raupach, M. (1983). Planen in der Fremdsprach [Planning in the foreign language]. Bern: Peter Lang.
Perdue, C., & Klein, W. (1992). Why does the production of some learners not grammaticalize? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 259–272.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. (1987). Procedural learning in advanced learners of a foreign language. Duisburg, Germany: Universität Gesamthochschule Duisburg.
Regan, V. (1995). The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 245–268). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Regan, V. (1998). Sociolinguistics and language learning in a study abroad context. Frontiers, 4, 61–90.Google Scholar
Ryan, J., & Lafford, B. (1992). Acquisition of lexical meaning in a study abroad environment: Ser and estar and the Granada experience. Hispania, 75, 714–722.Google Scholar
Schell, K. (2001). Functional categories and the acquisition of aspect in L2 Spanish: A longitudinal study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Siegal, M. (1995). Individual differences and study abroad: Women learning Japanese in Japan. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 225–244). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1996). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Walsh, R. (1994). The year abroad: A linguistic challenge. Teanga, 14, 48–57.Google Scholar
Waugh, L. R. (1982). Roman Jakobson's science of language. Lisse, Belgium: Peter de Ridder.