Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:10:52.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discourse Structure and the Negotiation of Comprehensible Input

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Susan Ehrlich ,
Peter Avery  and
Carlos Yorio
Susan Ehrlich
Affiliation:
York University
Peter Avery
Affiliation:
University of Toronto and George Brown College
Carlos Yorio
Affiliation:
Lehman College, CUNY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the role of negotiations of meaning in providing comprehensible input for NNS learners. We report on an experiment conducted with NS–NNS and NS–NS pairs involving a picture-drawing task, where one member of each pair instructed the other in the drawing of simple objects. The results of the experiment suggest that the success or failure of meaning negotiations in providing comprehensible input depends on the point in the discourse at which they occur. We therefore question a prevailing assumption in the second language acquisition literature that the mere quantity of meaning negotiations within a discourse is an accurate predictor of the quantity of comprehensible input that results. We propose that meaning negotiations should be analyzed within a discourse framework to explain their role in creating comprehensible input.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 397 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aston, G. (1986). Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, P., Ehrlich, S., & Yorio, C. (1985). Prosodic domains in foreigner talk discourse. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 214–229). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (1972). Cognitive pruning and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 56, 218–222.Google Scholar
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J. (1982). Discourse analysis. In Kittredge, R. & Lehrberger, J. (Eds.), Sublanguage: Studies of language in restricted semantic domains (pp. 138–174). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hinds, John. (1979). Organizational patterns in discourse. In Givón, T. (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 135–156). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–278.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (1987). Second language acquisition, social interaction and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T, & Doughty, C. (1988). Variations in classroom interaction as a function of participation pattern and task. In Fine, J. (Ed), Second language discourse (pp. 41–55). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R. C., & Higa, C. (1981). Input, negotiation and age differences in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 31, 409–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The Input Hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar